MBLY
Price
$15.27
Change
+$0.03 (+0.20%)
Updated
Jun 16, 01:21 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
25.88B
38 days until earnings call
MGA
Price
$37.88
Change
+$0.56 (+1.50%)
Updated
Jun 16, 01:23 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
15.65B
46 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MBLY vs MGA

Header iconMBLY vs MGA Comparison
Open Charts MBLY vs MGABanner chart's image
Mobileye Global
Price$15.27
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
Volume$4.73K
Capitalization25.88B
Magna International
Price$37.88
Change+$0.56 (+1.50%)
Volume$2.26K
Capitalization15.65B
MBLY vs MGA Comparison Chart
Loading...
MBLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MBLY vs. MGA commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBLY is a StrongBuy and MGA is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (MBLY: $15.24 vs. MGA: $37.32)
Brand notoriety: MBLY and MGA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MBLY: 118% vs. MGA: 59%
Market capitalization -- MBLY: $25.88B vs. MGA: $15.65B
MBLY [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $25.88B. MGA’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $15.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MBLY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMGA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MBLY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MGA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MGA is a better buy in the long-term than MBLY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MBLY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MBLY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MGA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MGA is a better buy in the short-term than MBLY.

Price Growth

MBLY (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -9.72% price change this week, while MGA (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +1.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -0.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.39%.

Reported Earning Dates

MBLY is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

MGA is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-0.68% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBLY($25.9B) has a higher market cap than MGA($15.7B). MGA YTD gains are higher at: -8.294 vs. MBLY (-23.494). MGA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.6B vs. MBLY (529M). MBLY (1.21B) and MGA (1.2B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . MBLY has less debt than MGA: MBLY (3.52B) vs MGA (7.22B). MGA has higher revenues than MBLY: MGA (42.8B) vs MBLY (2.08B).
MBLYMGAMBLY / MGA
Capitalization25.9B15.7B165%
EBITDA529M3.6B15%
Gain YTD-23.494-8.294283%
P/E RatioN/A12.61-
Revenue2.08B42.8B5%
Total Cash1.21B1.2B101%
Total Debt3.52B7.22B49%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MGA: Fundamental Ratings
MGA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
89
SMR RATING
1..100
69
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
79
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MBLYMGA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MBLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRTA5.080.01
+0.20%
Prothena Corp
COR295.540.50
+0.17%
Cencora
AGRO9.29-0.03
-0.32%
Adecoagro SA
RYN23.43-0.43
-1.80%
Rayonier
DRRX0.62-0.03
-3.91%
DURECT Corp

MBLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBLY has been loosely correlated with BWA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBLY jumps, then BWA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBLY
1D Price
Change %
MBLY100%
-4.03%
BWA - MBLY
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.93%
MGA - MBLY
43%
Loosely correlated
-3.04%
ALV - MBLY
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.28%
VC - MBLY
41%
Loosely correlated
-3.32%
ADNT - MBLY
41%
Loosely correlated
-2.95%
More

MGA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGA has been closely correlated with LEA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MGA jumps, then LEA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGA
1D Price
Change %
MGA100%
-3.04%
LEA - MGA
80%
Closely correlated
-3.20%
VC - MGA
73%
Closely correlated
-3.32%
ADNT - MGA
72%
Closely correlated
-2.95%
DAN - MGA
71%
Closely correlated
-0.86%
BWA - MGA
70%
Closely correlated
-0.93%
More