MBLY
Price
$13.85
Change
+$0.07 (+0.51%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
11.27B
67 days until earnings call
MGA
Price
$46.62
Change
+$0.06 (+0.13%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
13.17B
34 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MBLY vs MGA

Header iconMBLY vs MGA Comparison
Open Charts MBLY vs MGABanner chart's image
Mobileye Global
Price$13.85
Change+$0.07 (+0.51%)
Volume$5.86M
Capitalization11.27B
Magna International
Price$46.62
Change+$0.06 (+0.13%)
Volume$2.16M
Capitalization13.17B
MBLY vs MGA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MBLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MBLY vs. MGA commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBLY is a Buy and MGA is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (MBLY: $13.85 vs. MGA: $46.62)
Brand notoriety: MBLY and MGA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MBLY: 103% vs. MGA: 147%
Market capitalization -- MBLY: $11.27B vs. MGA: $13.17B
MBLY [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $11.27B. MGA’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $13.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $90.03B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MBLY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMGA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MBLY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MGA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MGA is a better buy in the long-term than MBLY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MBLY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGA’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MBLY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MGA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MBLY is a better buy in the short-term than MGA.

Price Growth

MBLY (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -7.11% price change this week, while MGA (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -0.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

MBLY is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2025.

MGA is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-0.60% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGA($13.2B) has a higher market cap than MBLY($11.3B). MGA YTD gains are higher at: 15.815 vs. MBLY (-30.472). MGA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.04B vs. MBLY (-2.51B). MBLY has more cash in the bank: 1.71B vs. MGA (1.54B). MGA has higher revenues than MBLY: MGA (41.6B) vs MBLY (1.92B).
MBLYMGAMBLY / MGA
Capitalization11.3B13.2B86%
EBITDA-2.51B4.04B-62%
Gain YTD-30.47215.815-193%
P/E RatioN/A10.94-
Revenue1.92B41.6B5%
Total Cash1.71B1.54B111%
Total DebtN/A8.12B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MBLY vs MGA: Fundamental Ratings
MBLY
MGA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1265
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10090
SMR RATING
1..100
9670
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6344
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10060
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MGA's Valuation (13) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MBLY (62). This means that MGA’s stock grew somewhat faster than MBLY’s over the last 12 months.

MGA's Profit vs Risk Rating (90) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as MBLY (100). This means that MGA’s stock grew similarly to MBLY’s over the last 12 months.

MGA's SMR Rating (70) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as MBLY (96). This means that MGA’s stock grew similarly to MBLY’s over the last 12 months.

MGA's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as MBLY (63). This means that MGA’s stock grew similarly to MBLY’s over the last 12 months.

MGA's P/E Growth Rating (60) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MBLY (100). This means that MGA’s stock grew somewhat faster than MBLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MBLYMGA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MBLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JMEE63.450.69
+1.10%
JPMorgan Small & Mid Cap Enh Eq ETF
FSCS36.630.38
+1.06%
First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF
RIGS23.280.05
+0.21%
RiverFront Strategic Income ETF
GNMA44.35-0.08
-0.17%
iShares GNMA Bond ETF
LBO30.14-0.09
-0.31%
WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Priv Eq ETF

MBLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBLY has been loosely correlated with BWA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBLY jumps, then BWA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBLY
1D Price
Change %
MBLY100%
+0.51%
BWA - MBLY
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.47%
ALV - MBLY
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.62%
VC - MBLY
43%
Loosely correlated
+2.11%
MGA - MBLY
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.13%
LEA - MBLY
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.18%
More

MGA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGA has been closely correlated with LEA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MGA jumps, then LEA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGA
1D Price
Change %
MGA100%
+0.13%
LEA - MGA
78%
Closely correlated
+1.18%
ADNT - MGA
75%
Closely correlated
-0.28%
VC - MGA
74%
Closely correlated
+2.11%
ALV - MGA
72%
Closely correlated
+1.62%
BWA - MGA
71%
Closely correlated
+1.47%
More