MBLU
Price
$23.25
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 11 closing price
SCZC
Price
$41.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
Ad is loading...

MBLU vs SCZC

Header iconMBLU vs SCZC Comparison
Open Charts MBLU vs SCZCBanner chart's image
Morris State Bancshares
Price$23.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$325
CapitalizationN/A
West Coast Community Ban
Price$41.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.44K
CapitalizationN/A
MBLU vs SCZC Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MBLU vs. SCZC commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBLU is a Hold and SCZC is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (MBLU: $23.25 vs. SCZC: $41.00)
Brand notoriety: MBLU and SCZC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MBLU: 26% vs. SCZC: 8%
Market capitalization -- MBLU: $164.79M vs. SCZC: $221.19M
MBLU [@Regional Banks] is valued at $164.79M. SCZC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $221.19M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MBLU’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSCZC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MBLU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SCZC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCZC is a better buy in the long-term than MBLU.

Price Growth

MBLU (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.71% price change this week, while SCZC (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.02%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.77% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCZC($221M) has a higher market cap than MBLU($165M). MBLU has higher P/E ratio than SCZC: MBLU (8.40) vs SCZC (6.49). MBLU YTD gains are higher at: 55.506 vs. SCZC (39.782). SCZC has more cash in the bank: 37M vs. MBLU (78.4K). SCZC has less debt than MBLU: SCZC (0) vs MBLU (48.5M). SCZC has higher revenues than MBLU: SCZC (80.3M) vs MBLU (59.9M).
MBLUSCZCMBLU / SCZC
Capitalization165M221M75%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD55.50639.782140%
P/E Ratio8.406.49130%
Revenue59.9M80.3M75%
Total Cash78.4K37M0%
Total Debt48.5M0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SCZC: Fundamental Ratings
SCZC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
23
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
17
SMR RATING
1..100
30
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
24
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X90584.1640002628.351600
+2.99%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA330.241.75
+0.53%
Tesla
AAPL225.120.89
+0.40%
Apple
SPY597.190.29
+0.05%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME26.46-0.38
-1.42%
GameStop Corp

MBLU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MBLU and LUMB have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MBLU and LUMB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBLU
1D Price
Change %
MBLU100%
N/A
LUMB - MBLU
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCZC - MBLU
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
TYCB - MBLU
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LOB - MBLU
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
BRKL - MBLU
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.47%
More

SCZC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SCZC and MBLU have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCZC and MBLU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCZC
1D Price
Change %
SCZC100%
+0.61%
MBLU - SCZC
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBOBA - SCZC
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SASR - SCZC
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.63%
LWCL - SCZC
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FITB - SCZC
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
More