MBKL
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
47M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MDVT
Price
$38.75
Change
+$0.23 (+0.60%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
33.36M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MBKL vs MDVT

Header iconMBKL vs MDVT Comparison
Open Charts MBKL vs MDVTBanner chart's image
MBT Bancshares
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$900
Capitalization47M
Middlebury National
Price$38.75
Change+$0.23 (+0.60%)
Volume$500
Capitalization33.36M
MBKL vs MDVT Comparison Chart in %
MBKL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MDVT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MBKL vs. MDVT commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBKL is a Buy and MDVT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (MBKL: $23.00 vs. MDVT: $38.75)
Brand notoriety: MBKL and MDVT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MBKL: 127% vs. MDVT: 55%
Market capitalization -- MBKL: $47M vs. MDVT: $33.36M
MBKL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $47M. MDVT’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $33.36M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MBKL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMDVT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MBKL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MDVT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MBKL is a better buy in the long-term than MDVT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MBKL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MDVT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MBKL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MDVT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MBKL is a better buy in the short-term than MDVT.

Price Growth

MBKL (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MDVT (@Regional Banks) price change was +5.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.37%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.09% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBKL($47M) has a higher market cap than MDVT($33.4M). MBKL YTD gains are higher at: 17.805 vs. MDVT (16.812).
MBKLMDVTMBKL / MDVT
Capitalization47M33.4M141%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD17.80516.812106%
P/E Ratio7.90N/A-
Revenue23.7MN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt10MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MBKL vs MDVT: Fundamental Ratings
MBKL
MDVT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4989
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
50100
SMR RATING
1..100
51100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4850
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3434
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5565

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MBKL's Valuation (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MDVT (64). This means that MBKL’s stock grew somewhat faster than MDVT’s over the last 12 months.

MBKL's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MDVT (100). This means that MBKL’s stock grew somewhat faster than MDVT’s over the last 12 months.

MBKL's SMR Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MDVT (100). This means that MBKL’s stock grew somewhat faster than MDVT’s over the last 12 months.

MBKL's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as MDVT (50). This means that MBKL’s stock grew similarly to MDVT’s over the last 12 months.

MBKL's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as MDVT (34). This means that MBKL’s stock grew similarly to MDVT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MBKLMDVT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
11%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
26%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MBKL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MDVT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FGPHF0.07N/A
N/A
First Graphene Limited
HRIBF92.00N/A
N/A
Horiba Ltd.
JPDYY1.48N/A
N/A
Japan Display, Inc.
MZTFF68.25N/A
N/A
Mizrahi Tefahot Bank Ltd.
USHAF0.02N/A
N/A
USHA RES LTD.

MBKL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBKL has been loosely correlated with CMGGF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBKL jumps, then CMGGF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBKL
1D Price
Change %
MBKL100%
N/A
CMGGF - MBKL
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HRGG - MBKL
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.16%
FFMR - MBKL
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
CRZBF - MBKL
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.67%
HCBN - MBKL
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MDVT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MDVT and FXNC have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MDVT and FXNC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MDVT
1D Price
Change %
MDVT100%
+3.83%
FXNC - MDVT
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.85%
SYBJF - MDVT
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCHT - MDVT
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MBKL - MDVT
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MFBP - MDVT
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More