MBINM
Price
$25.14
Change
-$0.14 (-0.55%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
TFINP
Price
$21.85
Change
-$0.10 (-0.46%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

MBINM vs TFINP

Header iconMBINM vs TFINP Comparison
Open Charts MBINM vs TFINPBanner chart's image
Merchants Ban
Price$25.14
Change-$0.14 (-0.55%)
Volume$34.63K
CapitalizationN/A
Triumph Financial
Price$21.85
Change-$0.10 (-0.46%)
Volume$388
CapitalizationN/A
MBINM vs TFINP Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MBINM vs. TFINP commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBINM is a StrongBuy and TFINP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (MBINM: $25.14 vs. TFINP: $21.85)
Brand notoriety: MBINM and TFINP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MBINM: 398% vs. TFINP: 9%
Market capitalization -- MBINM: $0 vs. TFINP: $0
MBINM [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. TFINP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MBINM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTFINP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MBINM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TFINP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MBINM and TFINP are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

MBINM (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.12% price change this week, while TFINP (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.95%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.53% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBINM YTD gains are higher at: 1.966 vs. TFINP (-1.739). TFINP has more cash in the bank: 93.1M vs. MBINM (10.6M). TFINP has less debt than MBINM: TFINP (405M) vs MBINM (964M). MBINM has higher revenues than TFINP: MBINM (559M) vs TFINP (418M).
MBINMTFINPMBINM / TFINP
CapitalizationN/AN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.966-1.739-113%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue559M418M134%
Total Cash10.6M93.1M11%
Total Debt964M405M238%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MGBRX17.18-0.15
-0.87%
MFS Global Total Return R2
VFINX552.95-6.23
-1.11%
Vanguard 500 Index Investor
DHPAX17.00-0.19
-1.11%
Diamond Hill Mid Cap Inv
HLEMX39.03-0.50
-1.26%
Harding Loevner Emerging Markets Advisor
ANOGX22.41-0.39
-1.71%
American Century Small Cap Growth R5

MBINM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBINM has been loosely correlated with FITBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBINM jumps, then FITBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBINM
1D Price
Change %
MBINM100%
+1.52%
FITBI - MBINM
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
WSBCP - MBINM
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
OZKAP - MBINM
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
FITBO - MBINM
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
FCNCO - MBINM
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.46%
More

TFINP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TFINP has been loosely correlated with FITBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TFINP jumps, then FITBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TFINP
1D Price
Change %
TFINP100%
+1.61%
FITBI - TFINP
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
FRMEP - TFINP
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.47%
MBINM - TFINP
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.52%
WTFCM - TFINP
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
HBANL - TFINP
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
More