MBINM
Price
$24.87
Change
-$0.02 (-0.08%)
Updated
Jul 7, 10:30 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
ONBPO
Price
$24.88
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

MBINM vs ONBPO

Header iconMBINM vs ONBPO Comparison
Open Charts MBINM vs ONBPOBanner chart's image
Merchants Ban
Price$24.87
Change-$0.02 (-0.08%)
Volume$1.4K
CapitalizationN/A
Old National Ban
Price$24.88
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5.2K
CapitalizationN/A
MBINM vs ONBPO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MBINM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ONBPO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MBINM vs. ONBPO commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBINM is a Hold and ONBPO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (MBINM: $24.89 vs. ONBPO: $24.88)
Brand notoriety: MBINM and ONBPO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MBINM: 178% vs. ONBPO: 60%
Market capitalization -- MBINM: $0 vs. ONBPO: $0
MBINM [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. ONBPO’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MBINM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileONBPO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MBINM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ONBPO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MBINM and ONBPO are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MBINM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ONBPO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MBINM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • ONBPO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ONBPO is a better buy in the short-term than MBINM.

Price Growth

MBINM (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.80% price change this week, while ONBPO (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.56%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.97% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ONBPO YTD gains are higher at: 4.311 vs. MBINM (0.952). ONBPO has more cash in the bank: 473M vs. MBINM (10.6M). MBINM has less debt than ONBPO: MBINM (964M) vs ONBPO (5.05B). ONBPO has higher revenues than MBINM: ONBPO (1.84B) vs MBINM (559M).
MBINMONBPOMBINM / ONBPO
CapitalizationN/AN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.9524.31122%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue559M1.84B30%
Total Cash10.6M473M2%
Total Debt964M5.05B19%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MBINMONBPO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
29%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
26%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
16%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
15%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
23%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
25%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
30%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
17%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
22%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
32%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MBINM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ONBPO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PDSB1.330.06
+4.72%
PDS Biotechnology Corp
CXW21.680.64
+3.04%
CoreCivic
SHBI16.630.29
+1.77%
Shore Bancshares
FRMEP25.32N/A
N/A
First Merchants Corp
AYI305.38-0.64
-0.21%
Acuity Inc

MBINM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBINM has been loosely correlated with FITBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBINM jumps, then FITBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBINM
1D Price
Change %
MBINM100%
-0.13%
FITBI - MBINM
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
OZKAP - MBINM
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
FITBO - MBINM
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.39%
ONBPO - MBINM
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HBANM - MBINM
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
More

ONBPO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ONBPO has been loosely correlated with ONBPP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ONBPO jumps, then ONBPP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ONBPO
1D Price
Change %
ONBPO100%
N/A
ONBPP - ONBPO
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
HBANL - ONBPO
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.56%
HBANP - ONBPO
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
VLYPO - ONBPO
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.71%
TCBIO - ONBPO
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
More