MBHCF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
5.98M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OPEN
Price
$8.56
Change
-$0.81 (-8.64%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
6.62B
104 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MBHCF vs OPEN

Header iconMBHCF vs OPEN Comparison
Open Charts MBHCF vs OPENBanner chart's image
MBH
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization5.98M
Opendoor Technologies
Price$8.56
Change-$0.81 (-8.64%)
Volume$206.46M
Capitalization6.62B
MBHCF vs OPEN Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MBHCF vs. OPEN commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBHCF is a Hold and OPEN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (MBHCF: $1.00 vs. OPEN: $9.37)
Brand notoriety: MBHCF and OPEN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MBHCF: 100% vs. OPEN: 118%
Market capitalization -- MBHCF: $5.98M vs. OPEN: $6.62B
MBHCF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $5.98M. OPEN’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $6.62B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MBHCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOPEN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MBHCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OPEN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MBHCF and OPEN are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OPEN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • OPEN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

MBHCF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while OPEN (@Real Estate Development) price change was +29.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

OPEN is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+0.62% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OPEN($6.62B) has a higher market cap than MBHCF($5.98M). OPEN YTD gains are higher at: 485.625 vs. MBHCF (0.000).
MBHCFOPENMBHCF / OPEN
Capitalization5.98M6.62B0%
EBITDAN/A-123M-
Gain YTD0.000485.625-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A5.18B-
Total CashN/A789M-
Total DebtN/A2.18B-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MBHCFOPEN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OPEN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRNCX11.950.08
+0.67%
T. Rowe Price Intl Disciplined Eq Adv
MRFOX34.510.15
+0.44%
Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity
RNPBX69.720.23
+0.33%
American Funds New Perspective R2
FCVAX19.49N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value A
LSCGX22.61-0.17
-0.75%
Loomis Sayles Global Growth C

MBHCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MBHCF and BVERS have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MBHCF and BVERS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBHCF
1D Price
Change %
MBHCF100%
N/A
BVERS - MBHCF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRST - MBHCF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OPAD - MBHCF
3%
Poorly correlated
+4.29%
OPEN - MBHCF
3%
Poorly correlated
+10.50%
UK - MBHCF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
More

OPEN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OPEN has been loosely correlated with OPAD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OPEN jumps, then OPAD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OPEN
1D Price
Change %
OPEN100%
+10.50%
OPAD - OPEN
42%
Loosely correlated
+4.29%
VONOY - OPEN
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.41%
COMP - OPEN
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
AIRE - OPEN
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.72%
CLLNY - OPEN
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.66%
More