MBGAF
Price
$68.86
Change
+$0.71 (+1.04%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
Capitalization
65.57B
91 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
POAHY
Price
$4.26
Change
+$0.08 (+1.91%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
Capitalization
12.91B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MBGAF vs POAHY

Header iconMBGAF vs POAHY Comparison
Open Charts MBGAF vs POAHYBanner chart's image
Mercedes Benz Group AG
Price$68.86
Change+$0.71 (+1.04%)
Volume$15.91K
Capitalization65.57B
Porsche Automobile Holding SE
Price$4.26
Change+$0.08 (+1.91%)
Volume$185.02K
Capitalization12.91B
MBGAF vs POAHY Comparison Chart in %
MBGAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
POAHY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MBGAF vs. POAHY commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBGAF is a Buy and POAHY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (MBGAF: $68.86 vs. POAHY: $4.26)
Brand notoriety: MBGAF and POAHY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Motor Vehicles industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MBGAF: 82% vs. POAHY: 100%
Market capitalization -- MBGAF: $65.57B vs. POAHY: $12.91B
MBGAF [@Motor Vehicles] is valued at $65.57B. POAHY’s [@Motor Vehicles] market capitalization is $12.91B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Motor Vehicles] industry ranges from $1.43T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Motor Vehicles] industry is $40.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MBGAF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePOAHY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MBGAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • POAHY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MBGAF is a better buy in the long-term than POAHY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MBGAF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while POAHY’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MBGAF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • POAHY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MBGAF and POAHY are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MBGAF (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а +3.64% price change this week, while POAHY (@Motor Vehicles) price change was +6.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was -0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

MBGAF is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Motor Vehicles (-0.93% weekly)

Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBGAF($65.6B) has a higher market cap than POAHY($12.9B). MBGAF has higher P/E ratio than POAHY: MBGAF (9.19) vs POAHY (3.00). MBGAF YTD gains are higher at: 24.579 vs. POAHY (21.743). MBGAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 17.4B vs. POAHY (-21.56B). MBGAF has more cash in the bank: 26.9B vs. POAHY (2.69B). POAHY has less debt than MBGAF: POAHY (7.62B) vs MBGAF (86.4B). MBGAF has higher revenues than POAHY: MBGAF (139B) vs POAHY (-21.65B).
MBGAFPOAHYMBGAF / POAHY
Capitalization65.6B12.9B509%
EBITDA17.4B-21.56B-81%
Gain YTD24.57921.743113%
P/E Ratio9.193.00307%
Revenue139B-21.65B-642%
Total Cash26.9B2.69B1,000%
Total Debt86.4B7.62B1,134%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MBGAF vs POAHY: Fundamental Ratings
MBGAF
POAHY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2124
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
63100
SMR RATING
1..100
7797
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4549
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
943
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

POAHY's Valuation (8) in the null industry is in the same range as MBGAF (22). This means that POAHY’s stock grew similarly to MBGAF’s over the last 12 months.

MBGAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for POAHY (100). This means that MBGAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than POAHY’s over the last 12 months.

MBGAF's SMR Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as POAHY (97). This means that MBGAF’s stock grew similarly to POAHY’s over the last 12 months.

MBGAF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as POAHY (49). This means that MBGAF’s stock grew similarly to POAHY’s over the last 12 months.

MBGAF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for POAHY (43). This means that MBGAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than POAHY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MBGAFPOAHY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
63%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MBGAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
POAHY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JEF59.413.12
+5.54%
Jefferies Financial Group
CMCO15.800.40
+2.60%
Columbus McKinnon Corp
ENVB5.980.04
+0.67%
Enveric Biosciences Inc.
RDAC10.460.01
+0.10%
Rising Dragon Acquisition Corp.
PARR41.07-3.02
-6.85%
Par Pacific Holdings

MBGAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBGAF has been closely correlated with MBGYY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 96% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MBGAF jumps, then MBGYY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBGAF
1D Price
Change %
MBGAF100%
+1.03%
MBGYY - MBGAF
96%
Closely correlated
+0.76%
VWAPY - MBGAF
73%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
VWAGY - MBGAF
71%
Closely correlated
+1.30%
POAHY - MBGAF
69%
Closely correlated
+2.03%
STLA - MBGAF
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
More

POAHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, POAHY has been closely correlated with VWAPY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if POAHY jumps, then VWAPY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To POAHY
1D Price
Change %
POAHY100%
+2.03%
VWAPY - POAHY
76%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
VWAGY - POAHY
74%
Closely correlated
+1.30%
MBGAF - POAHY
69%
Closely correlated
+1.03%
MBGYY - POAHY
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.76%
DRPRY - POAHY
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
More