MBFJF
Price
$13.51
Change
-$0.19 (-1.39%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
96.76B
SCBFF
Price
$16.55
Change
+$0.24 (+1.47%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
26.81B
25 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MBFJF vs SCBFF

Header iconMBFJF vs SCBFF Comparison
Open Charts MBFJF vs SCBFFBanner chart's image
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group
Price$13.51
Change-$0.19 (-1.39%)
Volume$819
Capitalization96.76B
Standard Chartered
Price$16.55
Change+$0.24 (+1.47%)
Volume$4.27K
Capitalization26.81B
MBFJF vs SCBFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MBFJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCBFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MBFJF vs. SCBFF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBFJF is a StrongBuy and SCBFF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (MBFJF: $13.51 vs. SCBFF: $16.55)
Brand notoriety: MBFJF and SCBFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MBFJF: 1% vs. SCBFF: 63%
Market capitalization -- MBFJF: $96.76B vs. SCBFF: $26.81B
MBFJF [@Major Banks] is valued at $96.76B. SCBFF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $26.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MBFJF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSCBFF’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • MBFJF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SCBFF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCBFF is a better buy in the long-term than MBFJF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MBFJF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCBFF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MBFJF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SCBFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SCBFF is a better buy in the short-term than MBFJF.

Price Growth

MBFJF (@Major Banks) experienced а +0.82% price change this week, while SCBFF (@Major Banks) price change was +0.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

SCBFF is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.55% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBFJF($96.8B) has a higher market cap than SCBFF($26.8B). MBFJF has higher P/E ratio than SCBFF: MBFJF (11.76) vs SCBFF (9.82). SCBFF YTD gains are higher at: 41.297 vs. MBFJF (26.854). SCBFF has less debt than MBFJF: SCBFF (93.9B) vs MBFJF (47.28T). MBFJF has higher revenues than SCBFF: MBFJF (6.06T) vs SCBFF (17.1B).
MBFJFSCBFFMBFJF / SCBFF
Capitalization96.8B26.8B361%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD26.85441.29765%
P/E Ratio11.769.82120%
Revenue6.06T17.1B35,421%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt47.28T93.9B50,355%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MBFJF vs SCBFF: Fundamental Ratings
MBFJF
SCBFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1712
SMR RATING
1..100
16
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4938
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7517
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SCBFF's Valuation (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MBFJF (66). This means that SCBFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MBFJF’s over the last 12 months.

SCBFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as MBFJF (17). This means that SCBFF’s stock grew similarly to MBFJF’s over the last 12 months.

MBFJF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as SCBFF (6). This means that MBFJF’s stock grew similarly to SCBFF’s over the last 12 months.

SCBFF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as MBFJF (49). This means that SCBFF’s stock grew similarly to MBFJF’s over the last 12 months.

SCBFF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MBFJF (75). This means that SCBFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MBFJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MBFJFSCBFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MBFJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCBFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCWO0.210.02
+8.63%
374Water
ASAN13.970.46
+3.40%
Asana
NTR60.140.15
+0.25%
Nutrien Ltd
SQFT5.14N/A
N/A
Presidio Property Trust Inc
FVRR28.90-0.20
-0.69%
Fiverr International Ltd

MBFJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MBFJF and BACHY have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MBFJF and BACHY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBFJF
1D Price
Change %
MBFJF100%
N/A
BACHY - MBFJF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
RBSPF - MBFJF
15%
Poorly correlated
+1.39%
NABZY - MBFJF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.62%
SCBFF - MBFJF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.50%
INGVF - MBFJF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SCBFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCBFF has been loosely correlated with SCBFY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCBFF jumps, then SCBFY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCBFF
1D Price
Change %
SCBFF100%
+1.50%
SCBFY - SCBFF
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.37%
MBFJF - SCBFF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NTIOF - SCBFF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.41%
IDCBY - SCBFF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.29%
NAUBF - SCBFF
2%
Poorly correlated
-5.65%
More