MBFJF
Price
$16.10
Change
+$0.13 (+0.81%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
183.19B
NAUBF
Price
$28.50
Change
+$1.76 (+6.58%)
Updated
Sep 19 closing price
Capitalization
87.8B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MBFJF vs NAUBF

Header iconMBFJF vs NAUBF Comparison
Open Charts MBFJF vs NAUBFBanner chart's image
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group
Price$16.10
Change+$0.13 (+0.81%)
Volume$1.32K
Capitalization183.19B
National Australia Bank Ltd. (Victoria, Australia)
Price$28.50
Change+$1.76 (+6.58%)
Volume$535
Capitalization87.8B
MBFJF vs NAUBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MBFJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NAUBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MBFJF vs. NAUBF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBFJF is a Hold and NAUBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (MBFJF: $16.10 vs. NAUBF: $28.50)
Brand notoriety: MBFJF and NAUBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MBFJF: 0% vs. NAUBF: 88%
Market capitalization -- MBFJF: $183.19B vs. NAUBF: $87.8B
MBFJF [@Major Banks] is valued at $183.19B. NAUBF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $87.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $869.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $136.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MBFJF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileNAUBF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MBFJF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • NAUBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MBFJF and NAUBF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MBFJF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NAUBF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MBFJF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NAUBF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MBFJF is a better buy in the short-term than NAUBF.

Price Growth

MBFJF (@Major Banks) experienced а +0.63% price change this week, while NAUBF (@Major Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +130.78%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-0.79% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBFJF($183B) has a higher market cap than NAUBF($87.8B). NAUBF has higher P/E ratio than MBFJF: NAUBF (19.34) vs MBFJF (15.01). MBFJF YTD gains are higher at: 51.174 vs. NAUBF (23.805). NAUBF has less debt than MBFJF: NAUBF (212B) vs MBFJF (46.25T). MBFJF has higher revenues than NAUBF: MBFJF (6.72T) vs NAUBF (20.7B).
MBFJFNAUBFMBFJF / NAUBF
Capitalization183B87.8B208%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD51.17423.805215%
P/E Ratio15.0119.3478%
Revenue6.72T20.7B32,449%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt46.25T212B21,815%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MBFJF vs NAUBF: Fundamental Ratings
MBFJF
NAUBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8197
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1324
SMR RATING
1..100
14
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4446
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2337
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NAUBF's Valuation (80) in the null industry is in the same range as MBFJF (89). This means that NAUBF’s stock grew similarly to MBFJF’s over the last 12 months.

MBFJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is in the same range as NAUBF (24). This means that MBFJF’s stock grew similarly to NAUBF’s over the last 12 months.

MBFJF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as NAUBF (4). This means that MBFJF’s stock grew similarly to NAUBF’s over the last 12 months.

MBFJF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as NAUBF (46). This means that MBFJF’s stock grew similarly to NAUBF’s over the last 12 months.

MBFJF's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the null industry is in the same range as NAUBF (37). This means that MBFJF’s stock grew similarly to NAUBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MBFJFNAUBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
70%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
39%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MBFJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NAUBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLWS4.770.05
+1.06%
1-800-FLOWERS.COM
INTU698.265.58
+0.81%
Intuit
RYTM99.160.02
+0.02%
Rhythm Pharmaceuticals
PLAB23.22-0.69
-2.89%
Photronics
IPWR5.05-0.16
-2.98%
Ideal Power

MBFJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MBFJF and BACHY have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MBFJF and BACHY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBFJF
1D Price
Change %
MBFJF100%
+0.81%
BACHY - MBFJF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.81%
RBSPF - MBFJF
15%
Poorly correlated
+2.02%
NABZY - MBFJF
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.48%
SCBFF - MBFJF
7%
Poorly correlated
+4.55%
INGVF - MBFJF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.73%
More

NAUBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NAUBF and BBVXF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NAUBF and BBVXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NAUBF
1D Price
Change %
NAUBF100%
N/A
BBVXF - NAUBF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
RBSPF - NAUBF
11%
Poorly correlated
+2.02%
INGVF - NAUBF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.73%
MBFJF - NAUBF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.81%
SCBFF - NAUBF
2%
Poorly correlated
+4.55%
More