MB
Price
$7.67
Change
-$0.08 (-1.03%)
Updated
Nov 13, 10:30 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
134.55M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
YUMC
Price
$46.37
Change
+$0.11 (+0.24%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
16.74B
88 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MB vs YUMC

Header iconMB vs YUMC Comparison
Open Charts MB vs YUMCBanner chart's image
Masterbeef Group
Price$7.67
Change-$0.08 (-1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization134.55M
Yum China Holdings
Price$46.37
Change+$0.11 (+0.24%)
Volume$1.16M
Capitalization16.74B
MB vs YUMC Comparison Chart in %
MB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
YUMC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MB vs. YUMC commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MB is a Buy and YUMC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (MB: $7.91 vs. YUMC: $46.26)
Brand notoriety: MB: Not notable vs. YUMC: Notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MB: 3% vs. YUMC: 84%
Market capitalization -- MB: $134.55M vs. YUMC: $16.74B
MB [@Restaurants] is valued at $134.55M. YUMC’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $16.74B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $219.04B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileYUMC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • YUMC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MB is a better buy in the long-term than YUMC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YUMC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • YUMC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, YUMC is a better buy in the short-term than MB.

Price Growth

MB (@Restaurants) experienced а -7.97% price change this week, while YUMC (@Restaurants) price change was +5.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

YUMC is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.48% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
YUMC($16.7B) has a higher market cap than MB($135M). MB has higher P/E ratio than YUMC: MB (31.78) vs YUMC (19.24).
MBYUMCMB / YUMC
Capitalization135M16.7B1%
EBITDAN/A1.73B-
Gain YTDN/A-2.444-
P/E Ratio31.7819.24165%
RevenueN/A11.4B-
Total CashN/A2.16B-
Total DebtN/A2.23B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
YUMC: Fundamental Ratings
YUMC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
11
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
53
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MBYUMC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
YUMC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PXPHF6.52N/A
N/A
Pexip Hldg ASA
CCBC16.30N/A
N/A
Chino Commercial Bancorp
PRSI4.55N/A
N/A
Portsmouth Square, Inc.
ABDBY5.12N/A
N/A
Alm Brand A/S
KBGGY12.02-0.22
-1.76%
Kongsberg Gruppen ASA

MB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MB and SBUX have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MB and SBUX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MB
1D Price
Change %
MB100%
N/A
SBUX - MB
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.97%
SHAK - MB
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.42%
KRUS - MB
11%
Poorly correlated
+3.84%
YUMC - MB
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
CNNE - MB
9%
Poorly correlated
+3.29%
More

YUMC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YUMC has been loosely correlated with YUM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if YUMC jumps, then YUM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YUMC
1D Price
Change %
YUMC100%
+0.50%
YUM - YUMC
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.92%
DPZ - YUMC
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.34%
QSR - YUMC
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
FRSH - YUMC
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SBUX - YUMC
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.97%
More