MAYS
Price
$38.00
Change
+$0.67 (+1.79%)
Updated
Jun 16, 10:30 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
90.71M
XIN
Price
$2.38
Change
+$0.36 (+17.82%)
Updated
Jun 16, 01:38 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
16.28M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MAYS vs XIN

Header iconMAYS vs XIN Comparison
Open Charts MAYS vs XINBanner chart's image
J. W. Mays
Price$38.00
Change+$0.67 (+1.79%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization90.71M
Xinyuan Real Estate
Price$2.38
Change+$0.36 (+17.82%)
Volume$100
Capitalization16.28M
MAYS vs XIN Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MAYS vs. XIN commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAYS is a StrongBuy and XIN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (MAYS: $37.33 vs. XIN: $2.02)
Brand notoriety: MAYS and XIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MAYS: 12% vs. XIN: 52%
Market capitalization -- MAYS: $90.71M vs. XIN: $16.28M
MAYS [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $90.71M. XIN’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $16.28M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MAYS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileXIN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MAYS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • XIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAYS is a better buy in the long-term than XIN.

Price Growth

MAYS (@Real Estate Development) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while XIN (@Real Estate Development) price change was -17.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +0.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.86%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+0.52% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAYS($90.7M) has a higher market cap than XIN($16.3M). MAYS YTD gains are higher at: -15.183 vs. XIN (-23.407). XIN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 208M vs. MAYS (1.25M). XIN has more cash in the bank: 1.09B vs. MAYS (2.86M). MAYS has less debt than XIN: MAYS (30.4M) vs XIN (3.38B). XIN has higher revenues than MAYS: XIN (1.97B) vs MAYS (21.7M).
MAYSXINMAYS / XIN
Capitalization90.7M16.3M556%
EBITDA1.25M208M1%
Gain YTD-15.183-23.40765%
P/E Ratio344.83N/A-
Revenue21.7M1.97B1%
Total Cash2.86M1.09B0%
Total Debt30.4M3.38B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MAYS vs XIN: Fundamental Ratings
MAYS
XIN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
50100
SMR RATING
1..100
9089
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7690
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
982
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

XIN's Valuation (23) in the Real Estate Development industry is significantly better than the same rating for MAYS (91). This means that XIN’s stock grew significantly faster than MAYS’s over the last 12 months.

MAYS's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for XIN (100). This means that MAYS’s stock grew somewhat faster than XIN’s over the last 12 months.

XIN's SMR Rating (89) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as MAYS (90). This means that XIN’s stock grew similarly to MAYS’s over the last 12 months.

MAYS's Price Growth Rating (76) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as XIN (90). This means that MAYS’s stock grew similarly to XIN’s over the last 12 months.

MAYS's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Real Estate Development industry is significantly better than the same rating for XIN (82). This means that MAYS’s stock grew significantly faster than XIN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DGP107.302.12
+2.02%
DB Gold Double Long ETN
FCT9.88N/A
N/A
First Trust Senior Floating Rate Income Fund II
BTGD36.60-0.09
-0.25%
STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF
PSEP39.95-0.32
-0.79%
Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF-Sep
SLYV77.90-1.58
-1.99%
SPDR® S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF

MAYS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MAYS and LRE have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAYS and LRE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAYS
1D Price
Change %
MAYS100%
N/A
LRE - MAYS
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.43%
XIN - MAYS
15%
Poorly correlated
-18.88%
CHCI - MAYS
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
BEKE - MAYS
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.74%
LODE - MAYS
4%
Poorly correlated
+6.69%
More

XIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XIN has been loosely correlated with HLPPY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if XIN jumps, then HLPPY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XIN
1D Price
Change %
XIN100%
-18.88%
HLPPY - XIN
44%
Loosely correlated
+2.56%
LGFRY - XIN
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.51%
DUO - XIN
39%
Loosely correlated
-9.02%
CAOVY - XIN
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.27%
HYSNY - XIN
32%
Poorly correlated
-4.12%
More