Advertisement
MATW vs SEB
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MATW is a Hold and SEB is a Hold.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MATW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SEB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MATW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SEB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
| MATW | SEB | MATW / SEB | |
| Capitalization | 954M | 3.11B | 31% |
| EBITDA | 175M | 448M | 39% |
| Gain YTD | -6.068 | 24.220 | -25% |
| P/E Ratio | 27.91 | 15.83 | 176% |
| Revenue | 1.88B | 9.56B | 20% |
| Total Cash | 37.9M | 1.03B | 4% |
| Total Debt | 931M | 1.67B | 56% |
MATW | SEB | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 27 Undervalued | 50 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 77 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | 87 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 8 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MATW's Valuation (27) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry is in the same range as SEB (50) in the Food Meat Or Fish Or Dairy industry. This means that MATW’s stock grew similarly to SEB’s over the last 12 months.
MATW's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry is in the same range as SEB (100) in the Food Meat Or Fish Or Dairy industry. This means that MATW’s stock grew similarly to SEB’s over the last 12 months.
SEB's SMR Rating (87) in the Food Meat Or Fish Or Dairy industry is in the same range as MATW (93) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry. This means that SEB’s stock grew similarly to MATW’s over the last 12 months.
MATW's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry is in the same range as SEB (47) in the Food Meat Or Fish Or Dairy industry. This means that MATW’s stock grew similarly to SEB’s over the last 12 months.
SEB's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Food Meat Or Fish Or Dairy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MATW (44) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry. This means that SEB’s stock grew somewhat faster than MATW’s over the last 12 months.
| MATW | SEB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 69% | 5 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 69% | 5 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 71% | 5 days ago 56% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 70% | 5 days ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 66% | 5 days ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 69% | 5 days ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 65% | 6 days ago 52% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 74% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 62% | 5 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 70% | 5 days ago 53% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TPLGX | 78.38 | 0.87 | +1.12% |
| T. Rowe Price Instl Large Cap Core Gr | |||
| GSXCX | 27.36 | 0.25 | +0.92% |
| abrdn US Small Cap Equity C | |||
| HFDFX | 19.46 | 0.11 | +0.57% |
| Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps F | |||
| TCAGX | 8.97 | 0.05 | +0.56% |
| Timothy Plan Small/Mid Cap Growth Cl C | |||
| GBLEX | 39.91 | 0.15 | +0.38% |
| American Funds Global Balanced F1 | |||
MATW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MATW has been loosely correlated with NWPX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MATW jumps, then NWPX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MATW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MATW | 100% | -0.66% | ||
| NWPX - MATW | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.04% | ||
| CODI - MATW | 48% Loosely correlated | +2.00% | ||
| IIIN - MATW | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| HON - MATW | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| MDU - MATW | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.72% | ||
More | ||||
SEB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SEB and IIIN have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SEB and IIIN's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SEB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEB | 100% | -0.12% | ||
| IIIN - SEB | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.51% | ||
| TRC - SEB | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.98% | ||
| MLI - SEB | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.61% | ||
| MATW - SEB | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.66% | ||
| ESAB - SEB | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.42% | ||
More | ||||