MATH
Price
$1.60
Change
+$0.02 (+1.26%)
Updated
Jan 23, 01:23 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
55.42M
MIGI
Price
$0.88
Change
+$0.01 (+1.15%)
Updated
Jan 23, 02:38 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
25.47M
Ad is loading...

MATH vs MIGI

Header iconMATH vs MIGI Comparison
Open Charts MATH vs MIGIBanner chart's image
Metalpha Technology Holding
Price$1.60
Change+$0.02 (+1.26%)
Volume$100
Capitalization55.42M
Mawson Infrastructure Group
Price$0.88
Change+$0.01 (+1.15%)
Volume$5.85K
Capitalization25.47M
MATH vs MIGI Comparison Chart
Loading...
MATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MIGI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MATH vs. MIGI commentary
Jan 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MATH is a Hold and MIGI is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 23, 2025
Stock price -- (MATH: $1.66 vs. MIGI: $0.90)
Brand notoriety: MATH and MIGI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MATH: 86% vs. MIGI: 13%
Market capitalization -- MATH: $55.42M vs. MIGI: $25.47M
MATH [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $55.42M. MIGI’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $25.47M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MATH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMIGI’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MATH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MIGI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MATH is a better buy in the long-term than MIGI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MATH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MIGI’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MATH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MIGI’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MATH is a better buy in the short-term than MIGI.

Price Growth

MATH (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +9.56% price change this week, while MIGI (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -1.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +1.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +18.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +40.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

MATH is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2023.

MIGI is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+1.46% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MATH($55.4M) has a higher market cap than MIGI($25.5M). MATH YTD gains are higher at: 44.348 vs. MIGI (8.069).
MATHMIGIMATH / MIGI
Capitalization55.4M25.5M217%
EBITDAN/A-21.7M-
Gain YTD44.3488.069550%
P/E RatioN/A5.41-
RevenueN/A46.4M-
Total CashN/A1.5M-
Total DebtN/A20.7M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MATH vs MIGI: Fundamental Ratings
MATH
MIGI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2952
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3791
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10095
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
41n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MATH's Valuation (55) in the null industry is in the same range as MIGI (60). This means that MATH’s stock grew similarly to MIGI’s over the last 12 months.

MATH's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MIGI (100). This means that MATH’s stock grew similarly to MIGI’s over the last 12 months.

MATH's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MIGI (100). This means that MATH’s stock grew similarly to MIGI’s over the last 12 months.

MATH's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MIGI (91). This means that MATH’s stock grew somewhat faster than MIGI’s over the last 12 months.

MIGI's P/E Growth Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as MATH (100). This means that MIGI’s stock grew similarly to MATH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MATHMIGI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
87%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
84%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
86%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MIGI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X106146.2660004129.601600
+4.05%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY603.055.47
+0.92%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME27.47-0.04
-0.15%
GameStop Corp
TSLA424.07-2.43
-0.57%
Tesla
AAPL222.64-7.34
-3.19%
Apple

MATH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MATH and MEGL have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MATH and MEGL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MATH
1D Price
Change %
MATH100%
+3.11%
MEGL - MATH
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.20%
MIGI - MATH
22%
Poorly correlated
-5.65%
MCQEF - MATH
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.83%
SDIG - MATH
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.24%
BTCWF - MATH
20%
Poorly correlated
-6.87%
More

MIGI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MIGI has been loosely correlated with ARBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MIGI jumps, then ARBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MIGI
1D Price
Change %
MIGI100%
-5.65%
ARBK - MIGI
43%
Loosely correlated
-2.73%
SDIG - MIGI
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.24%
HUT - MIGI
39%
Loosely correlated
-2.97%
CLSK - MIGI
38%
Loosely correlated
-7.67%
BITF - MIGI
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.60%
More