Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MATFX vs PNSIX
MATFX vs PNSIX Comparison
Open Charts MATFX vs PNSIX
Matthews Asia Innovators Investor
Price$16.61
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets317.14M
T. Rowe Price New Asia I
Price$20.61
Change-$0.03 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.15B
MATFX vs PNSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MATFX vs. PNSIX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MATFX is a Hold and PNSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PNSIX has more cash in the bank: 2.15B vs. MATFX (317M). PNSIX pays higher dividends than MATFX: PNSIX (1.03) vs MATFX (0.00). MATFX was incepted earlier than PNSIX: MATFX (26 years) vs PNSIX (10 years). MATFX (1.29) is less costly to investors than PNSIX (0.86). MATFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 257.92 vs. PNSIX (54.80). MATFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PNSIX: MATFX (2500) vs PNSIX (500000). MATFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.72 vs. PNSIX (21.63). PNSIX return over 5 years is better than : -10.83 vs. MATFX (-32.44).
| MATFX | PNSIX | MATFX / PNSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.83 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.86 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.284 | 23.515 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 500000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 317M | 2.15B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.03 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.72 | 21.63 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.08 | 28.15 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | -32.44 | -10.83 | 300% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.79 | N/A | - |