Advertisement
MARPS vs PBT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MARPS is a Hold and PBT is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MARPS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePBT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- MARPS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- PBT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MARPS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PBT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MARPS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PBT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
MARPS (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +10.23% price change this week, while PBT (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was -1.02% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +0.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.24%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+0.23% weekly)Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
| MARPS | PBT | MARPS / PBT | |
| Capitalization | 8.24M | 578M | 1% |
| EBITDA | 849K | 28M | 3% |
| Gain YTD | 28.230 | 15.492 | 182% |
| P/E Ratio | 9.51 | 20.68 | 46% |
| Revenue | 1.13M | 29.1M | 4% |
| Total Cash | 994K | 6.05M | 16% |
| Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
MARPS | PBT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 1 | 85 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 49 Fair valued | 100 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 57 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 15 | 1 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | 95 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 18 | 17 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MARPS's Valuation (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PBT (100). This means that MARPS’s stock grew somewhat faster than PBT’s over the last 12 months.
PBT's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as MARPS (66). This means that PBT’s stock grew similarly to MARPS’s over the last 12 months.
PBT's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as MARPS (15). This means that PBT’s stock grew similarly to MARPS’s over the last 12 months.
PBT's Price Growth Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as MARPS (96). This means that PBT’s stock grew similarly to MARPS’s over the last 12 months.
PBT's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as MARPS (18). This means that PBT’s stock grew similarly to MARPS’s over the last 12 months.
| MARPS | PBT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 12 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 66% | 7 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 84% |
Advertisement
MARPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MARPS and BPPTU have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MARPS and BPPTU's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MARPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MARPS | 100% | +4.98% | ||
| BPPTU - MARPS | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.92% | ||
| CMBT - MARPS | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.09% | ||
| IMPP - MARPS | 20% Poorly correlated | -2.80% | ||
| NGL - MARPS | 11% Poorly correlated | +1.42% | ||
| PBT - MARPS | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.31% | ||
More | ||||
PBT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PBT has been loosely correlated with OKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PBT jumps, then OKE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PBT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PBT | 100% | -0.31% | ||
| OKE - PBT | 50% Loosely correlated | -3.51% | ||
| EPD - PBT | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.61% | ||
| ET - PBT | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.32% | ||
| TRGP - PBT | 44% Loosely correlated | -4.56% | ||
| MPLX - PBT | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.06% | ||
More | ||||