MARPS
Price
$4.53
Change
+$0.12 (+2.72%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
8.24M
NGL
Price
$4.27
Change
-$0.06 (-1.39%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
768.57M
37 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MARPS vs NGL

Header iconMARPS vs NGL Comparison
Open Charts MARPS vs NGLBanner chart's image
Marine Petroleum Trust
Price$4.53
Change+$0.12 (+2.72%)
Volume$47.61K
Capitalization8.24M
NGL Energy Partners
Price$4.27
Change-$0.06 (-1.39%)
Volume$718.23K
Capitalization768.57M
MARPS vs NGL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MARPS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NGL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MARPS vs. NGL commentary
Jul 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MARPS is a Buy and NGL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 01, 2025
Stock price -- (MARPS: $4.53 vs. NGL: $4.27)
Brand notoriety: MARPS and NGL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MARPS: 41% vs. NGL: 187%
Market capitalization -- MARPS: $8.24M vs. NGL: $768.57M
MARPS [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $8.24M. NGL’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $768.57M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $76.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $10.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MARPS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNGL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MARPS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NGL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MARPS is a better buy in the long-term than NGL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MARPS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NGL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MARPS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NGL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MARPS and NGL are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MARPS (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -13.81% price change this week, while NGL (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was -7.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +2.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

NGL is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+2.58% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NGL($769M) has a higher market cap than MARPS($8.24M). MARPS YTD gains are higher at: 19.637 vs. NGL (-14.429). NGL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 571M vs. MARPS (849K). MARPS has more cash in the bank: 994K vs. NGL (738K). NGL has higher revenues than MARPS: NGL (7.38B) vs MARPS (1.13M).
MARPSNGLMARPS / NGL
Capitalization8.24M769M1%
EBITDA849K571M0%
Gain YTD19.637-14.429-136%
P/E Ratio9.51N/A-
Revenue1.13M7.38B0%
Total Cash994K738K135%
Total DebtN/A2.79B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MARPS vs NGL: Fundamental Ratings
MARPS
NGL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5073
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
69100
SMR RATING
1..100
1598
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4249
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2880
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NGL's Valuation (12) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as MARPS (42) in the null industry. This means that NGL’s stock grew similarly to MARPS’s over the last 12 months.

MARPS's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as NGL (100) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that MARPS’s stock grew similarly to NGL’s over the last 12 months.

MARPS's SMR Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NGL (98) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that MARPS’s stock grew significantly faster than NGL’s over the last 12 months.

MARPS's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as NGL (49) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that MARPS’s stock grew similarly to NGL’s over the last 12 months.

MARPS's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NGL (80) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that MARPS’s stock grew somewhat faster than NGL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MARPSNGL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MARPS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NGL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BUFDX33.050.22
+0.67%
Buffalo Growth & Income
WPVIX34.840.18
+0.52%
Weitz Multi Cap Equity-Institutional Cl
MRGHX52.870.21
+0.40%
MFS Core Equity R3
AGTIX167.920.61
+0.36%
AB Sustainable Global Thematic I
MRVYX13.810.01
+0.07%
Mirova International Megatrends Y

MARPS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MARPS and BPT have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MARPS and BPT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MARPS
1D Price
Change %
MARPS100%
+2.61%
BPT - MARPS
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.33%
CMBT - MARPS
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.06%
IMPP - MARPS
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.65%
NGL - MARPS
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.39%
GLNG - MARPS
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.56%
More

NGL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NGL has been loosely correlated with HESM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NGL jumps, then HESM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NGL
1D Price
Change %
NGL100%
-1.39%
HESM - NGL
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
PAA - NGL
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
PAGP - NGL
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
WES - NGL
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
ET - NGL
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.38%
More