MAR
Price
$319.60
Change
-$3.36 (-1.04%)
Updated
Jan 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
85.79B
26 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WH
Price
$79.90
Change
-$0.68 (-0.84%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
6.04B
34 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MAR vs WH

Header iconMAR vs WH Comparison
Open Charts MAR vs WHBanner chart's image
Marriott International
Price$319.60
Change-$3.36 (-1.04%)
Volume$28.03K
Capitalization85.79B
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts
Price$79.90
Change-$0.68 (-0.84%)
Volume$863.69K
Capitalization6.04B
MAR vs WH Comparison Chart in %
MAR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MAR vs. WH commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAR is a Hold and WH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (MAR: $319.68 vs. WH: $79.90)
Brand notoriety: MAR: Notable vs. WH: Not notable
Both companies represent the Cable/Satellite TV industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MAR: 96% vs. WH: 78%
Market capitalization -- MAR: $85.79B vs. WH: $6.04B
MAR [@Cable/Satellite TV] is valued at $85.79B. WH’s [@Cable/Satellite TV] market capitalization is $6.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Cable/Satellite TV] industry ranges from $85.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Cable/Satellite TV] industry is $10.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MAR’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileWH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MAR’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • WH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAR is a better buy in the long-term than WH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MAR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WH’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MAR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WH is a better buy in the short-term than MAR.

Price Growth

MAR (@Cable/Satellite TV) experienced а +0.13% price change this week, while WH (@Cable/Satellite TV) price change was +2.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Cable/Satellite TV industry was +1.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.87%.

Reported Earning Dates

MAR is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.

WH is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Cable/Satellite TV (+1.22% weekly)

Companies that operate paid and subscriber-based broadcast facilities for cable and home satellite systems. Comcast Corp, Charter Communications, Inc. and DISH Network Corporation are some of the biggest cable/satellite TV providers. Customers typically pay a regular monthly fee to cable TV operators for unlimited access to a certain package of channels. Since the rising popularity of online streaming services have increased instances of cord-cutting among consumers, several cable operators have also diversified into internet services to milk the burgeoning appetite for internet-based content.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAR($85.8B) has a higher market cap than WH($6.04B). MAR has higher P/E ratio than WH: MAR (33.72) vs WH (18.45). WH YTD gains are higher at: 5.744 vs. MAR (4.100). MAR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.74B vs. WH (635M). WH has more cash in the bank: 749M vs. MAR (678M). WH has less debt than MAR: WH (2.63B) vs MAR (16.9B). MAR has higher revenues than WH: MAR (25.9B) vs WH (1.44B).
MARWHMAR / WH
Capitalization85.8B6.04B1,421%
EBITDA4.74B635M747%
Gain YTD4.1005.74471%
P/E Ratio33.7218.45183%
Revenue25.9B1.44B1,804%
Total Cash678M749M91%
Total Debt16.9B2.63B643%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MAR vs WH: Fundamental Ratings
MAR
WH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8018
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2058
SMR RATING
1..100
521
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1760
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3192
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WH's Valuation (38) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAR (94). This means that WH’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAR’s over the last 12 months.

MAR's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WH (58). This means that MAR’s stock grew somewhat faster than WH’s over the last 12 months.

MAR's SMR Rating (5) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as WH (21). This means that MAR’s stock grew similarly to WH’s over the last 12 months.

MAR's Price Growth Rating (17) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WH (60). This means that MAR’s stock grew somewhat faster than WH’s over the last 12 months.

MAR's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WH (92). This means that MAR’s stock grew somewhat faster than WH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MARWH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MAR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BSMC36.180.01
+0.02%
Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF
SPHY23.79N/A
N/A
State Street® SPDR® Port Hi Yld Bd ETF
EES59.25-0.02
-0.03%
WisdomTree US SmallCap Earnings ETF
EBIT35.19-0.03
-0.09%
Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF
SAMM31.15-0.04
-0.13%
Strategas Macro Momentum ETF

MAR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAR has been closely correlated with HLT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAR jumps, then HLT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAR
1D Price
Change %
MAR100%
-0.12%
HLT - MAR
85%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
H - MAR
81%
Closely correlated
+1.98%
IHG - MAR
74%
Closely correlated
-0.11%
WH - MAR
72%
Closely correlated
+2.55%
CHH - MAR
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.33%
More

WH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WH has been closely correlated with HLT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WH jumps, then HLT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WH
1D Price
Change %
WH100%
-0.84%
HLT - WH
76%
Closely correlated
-0.16%
CHH - WH
75%
Closely correlated
-0.28%
H - WH
74%
Closely correlated
-0.15%
IHG - WH
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.59%
MAR - WH
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.02%
More