MAR
Price
$258.03
Change
-$1.89 (-0.73%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:54 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
70.56B
80 days until earnings call
WH
Price
$83.95
Change
-$0.01 (-0.01%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.41B
72 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MAR vs WH

Header iconMAR vs WH Comparison
Open Charts MAR vs WHBanner chart's image
Marriott International
Price$258.03
Change-$1.89 (-0.73%)
Volume$6.91K
Capitalization70.56B
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts
Price$83.95
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
Volume$4.1K
Capitalization6.41B
MAR vs WH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MAR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MAR vs. WH commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAR is a StrongBuy and WH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (MAR: $259.92 vs. WH: $83.96)
Brand notoriety: MAR: Notable vs. WH: Not notable
Both companies represent the Cable/Satellite TV industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MAR: 91% vs. WH: 54%
Market capitalization -- MAR: $70.56B vs. WH: $6.41B
MAR [@Cable/Satellite TV] is valued at $70.56B. WH’s [@Cable/Satellite TV] market capitalization is $6.41B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Cable/Satellite TV] industry ranges from $70.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Cable/Satellite TV] industry is $8.68B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MAR’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MAR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • WH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MAR and WH are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MAR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MAR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • WH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MAR is a better buy in the short-term than WH.

Price Growth

MAR (@Cable/Satellite TV) experienced а +1.79% price change this week, while WH (@Cable/Satellite TV) price change was +0.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Cable/Satellite TV industry was +1.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.61%.

Reported Earning Dates

MAR is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

WH is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Cable/Satellite TV (+1.10% weekly)

Companies that operate paid and subscriber-based broadcast facilities for cable and home satellite systems. Comcast Corp, Charter Communications, Inc. and DISH Network Corporation are some of the biggest cable/satellite TV providers. Customers typically pay a regular monthly fee to cable TV operators for unlimited access to a certain package of channels. Since the rising popularity of online streaming services have increased instances of cord-cutting among consumers, several cable operators have also diversified into internet services to milk the burgeoning appetite for internet-based content.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAR($70.6B) has a higher market cap than WH($6.41B). MAR has higher P/E ratio than WH: MAR (29.27) vs WH (19.76). MAR YTD gains are higher at: -6.370 vs. WH (-15.895). MAR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.42B vs. WH (632M). MAR has more cash in the bank: 523M vs. WH (50M). WH has less debt than MAR: WH (2.58B) vs MAR (15.9B). MAR has higher revenues than WH: MAR (25.4B) vs WH (1.45B).
MARWHMAR / WH
Capitalization70.6B6.41B1,101%
EBITDA4.42B632M700%
Gain YTD-6.370-15.89540%
P/E Ratio29.2719.76148%
Revenue25.4B1.45B1,752%
Total Cash523M50M1,046%
Total Debt15.9B2.58B617%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MAR vs WH: Fundamental Ratings
MAR
WH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2233
SMR RATING
1..100
522
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5960
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2276
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WH's Valuation (50) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAR (98). This means that WH’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAR’s over the last 12 months.

MAR's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as WH (33). This means that MAR’s stock grew similarly to WH’s over the last 12 months.

MAR's SMR Rating (5) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as WH (22). This means that MAR’s stock grew similarly to WH’s over the last 12 months.

MAR's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as WH (60). This means that MAR’s stock grew similarly to WH’s over the last 12 months.

MAR's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WH (76). This means that MAR’s stock grew somewhat faster than WH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MARWH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MAR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XDQQ36.420.30
+0.84%
Innovator Gr 100 Acltd ETF™ Quarterly
KIE56.940.34
+0.60%
SPDR® S&P Insurance ETF
SCHF22.480.11
+0.49%
Schwab International Equity ETF™
YQQQ13.53-0.11
-0.80%
YieldMax Short N100 Option Inc Strgy ETF
FDIG36.49-0.45
-1.22%
Fidelity Crypto Industry&DgtlPymntsETF

MAR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAR has been closely correlated with HLT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAR jumps, then HLT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAR
1D Price
Change %
MAR100%
-0.26%
HLT - MAR
88%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
H - MAR
83%
Closely correlated
-0.14%
WH - MAR
76%
Closely correlated
+0.20%
IHG - MAR
75%
Closely correlated
-3.52%
CHH - MAR
68%
Closely correlated
-2.02%
More

WH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WH has been closely correlated with HLT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WH jumps, then HLT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WH
1D Price
Change %
WH100%
+0.20%
HLT - WH
77%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
MAR - WH
76%
Closely correlated
-0.26%
H - WH
74%
Closely correlated
-0.14%
IHG - WH
64%
Loosely correlated
-3.52%
CHH - WH
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.02%
More