MAR
Price
$265.07
Change
+$0.59 (+0.22%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
71.96B
56 days until earnings call
WH
Price
$86.05
Change
-$0.30 (-0.35%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
6.57B
48 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MAR vs WH

Header iconMAR vs WH Comparison
Open Charts MAR vs WHBanner chart's image
Marriott International
Price$265.07
Change+$0.59 (+0.22%)
Volume$1.05M
Capitalization71.96B
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts
Price$86.05
Change-$0.30 (-0.35%)
Volume$731.75K
Capitalization6.57B
MAR vs WH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MAR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MAR vs. WH commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAR is a Hold and WH is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (MAR: $265.07 vs. WH: $86.05)
Brand notoriety: MAR: Notable vs. WH: Not notable
Both companies represent the Cable/Satellite TV industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MAR: 79% vs. WH: 70%
Market capitalization -- MAR: $71.96B vs. WH: $6.57B
MAR [@Cable/Satellite TV] is valued at $71.96B. WH’s [@Cable/Satellite TV] market capitalization is $6.57B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Cable/Satellite TV] industry ranges from $71.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Cable/Satellite TV] industry is $8.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MAR’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MAR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • WH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAR is a better buy in the long-term than WH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MAR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WH’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MAR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • WH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WH is a better buy in the short-term than MAR.

Price Growth

MAR (@Cable/Satellite TV) experienced а -1.71% price change this week, while WH (@Cable/Satellite TV) price change was -3.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Cable/Satellite TV industry was -0.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

MAR is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

WH is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Cable/Satellite TV (-0.55% weekly)

Companies that operate paid and subscriber-based broadcast facilities for cable and home satellite systems. Comcast Corp, Charter Communications, Inc. and DISH Network Corporation are some of the biggest cable/satellite TV providers. Customers typically pay a regular monthly fee to cable TV operators for unlimited access to a certain package of channels. Since the rising popularity of online streaming services have increased instances of cord-cutting among consumers, several cable operators have also diversified into internet services to milk the burgeoning appetite for internet-based content.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAR($72B) has a higher market cap than WH($6.57B). MAR has higher P/E ratio than WH: MAR (29.85) vs WH (20.25). MAR YTD gains are higher at: -4.271 vs. WH (-13.501). MAR has more cash in the bank: 225M vs. WH (50M). WH has less debt than MAR: WH (2.58B) vs MAR (15.9B).
MARWHMAR / WH
Capitalization72B6.57B1,096%
EBITDAN/A632M-
Gain YTD-4.271-13.50132%
P/E Ratio29.8520.25147%
RevenueN/A1.45B-
Total Cash225M50M450%
Total Debt15.9B2.58B617%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MAR vs WH: Fundamental Ratings
MAR
WH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6714
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2335
SMR RATING
1..100
523
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3960
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2376
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1450

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WH's Valuation (54) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAR (98). This means that WH’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAR’s over the last 12 months.

MAR's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as WH (35). This means that MAR’s stock grew similarly to WH’s over the last 12 months.

MAR's SMR Rating (5) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as WH (23). This means that MAR’s stock grew similarly to WH’s over the last 12 months.

MAR's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as WH (60). This means that MAR’s stock grew similarly to WH’s over the last 12 months.

MAR's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WH (76). This means that MAR’s stock grew somewhat faster than WH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MARWH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MAR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BSGSX15.69-0.07
-0.44%
Baird Small/Mid Cap Growth Investor
RGAHX83.73-0.48
-0.57%
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
ASVDX10.62-0.07
-0.65%
American Century Small Cap Value R6
SGQAX44.69-0.48
-1.06%
DWS International Growth A
VCRIX14.41-0.16
-1.10%
NYLI CBRE Global Infrastructure Class I

MAR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAR has been closely correlated with HLT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAR jumps, then HLT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAR
1D Price
Change %
MAR100%
+0.22%
HLT - MAR
86%
Closely correlated
-0.37%
H - MAR
83%
Closely correlated
+0.34%
WH - MAR
74%
Closely correlated
-0.35%
IHG - MAR
74%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
CHH - MAR
67%
Closely correlated
+0.30%
More

WH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WH has been closely correlated with HLT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WH jumps, then HLT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WH
1D Price
Change %
WH100%
-0.30%
HLT - WH
78%
Closely correlated
-0.02%
H - WH
74%
Closely correlated
-0.92%
MAR - WH
74%
Closely correlated
-1.26%
IHG - WH
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.14%
CHH - WH
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.31%
More