Advertisement
MAR vs QARP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAR is a Buy and QARP is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MAR’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while.
- MAR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MAR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- MAR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
MAR (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а +0.18% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was -1.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.87%.
Reported Earning Dates
MAR is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (-1.41% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.
MAR | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 69 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 98 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 18 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 5 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 23 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| MAR | QARP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 67% | 6 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 54% | 15 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 80% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SCHQ | 31.60 | 0.46 | +1.48% |
| Schwab Long-Term US Treasury ETF | |||
| WIA | 8.34 | 0.04 | +0.48% |
| Western Asset Inflation-Linked Income Fund | |||
| FTIF | 22.17 | 0.04 | +0.17% |
| First Trust Bloomberg Infl Snstv Eq ETF | |||
| NULC | 50.48 | N/A | N/A |
| Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF | |||
| SCHG | 30.14 | -0.16 | -0.53% |
| Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF™ | |||
MAR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAR has been closely correlated with HLT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAR jumps, then HLT could also see price increases.
QARP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QARP has been closely correlated with MAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QARP jumps, then MAR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QARP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QARP | 100% | -0.39% | ||
| MAR - QARP | 75% Closely correlated | -0.84% | ||
| HST - QARP | 74% Closely correlated | -0.73% | ||
| CRH - QARP | 73% Closely correlated | -2.82% | ||
| COF - QARP | 72% Closely correlated | -0.17% | ||
| LECO - QARP | 70% Closely correlated | -1.26% | ||
More | ||||