Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MAPTX vs TRZNX
MAPTX vs TRZNX Comparison
Open Charts MAPTX vs TRZNX
Matthews Pacific Tiger Investor
Price$22.34
Change-$0.07 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets735.84M
T. Rowe Price New Asia Z
Price$20.62
Change-$0.02 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.15B
MAPTX vs TRZNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRZNX has more cash in the bank: 2.15B vs. MAPTX (736M). MAPTX pays higher dividends than TRZNX: MAPTX (2.52) vs TRZNX (1.85). MAPTX was incepted earlier than TRZNX: MAPTX (31 years) vs TRZNX (5 years). MAPTX (1.22) is less costly to investors than TRZNX (0.83). MAPTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 386.73 vs. TRZNX (54.80). TRZNX has a lower initial minimum investment than MAPTX: TRZNX (0) vs MAPTX (2500). TRZNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.75 vs. MAPTX (17.18).
| MAPTX | TRZNX | MAPTX / TRZNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.83 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.414 | 24.547 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 736M | 2.15B | 34% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.52 | 1.85 | 136% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.18 | 22.75 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.12 | 31.52 | 19% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.57 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.13 | N/A | - |