MAPS
Price
$1.14
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
122.46M
62 days until earnings call
VRAR
Price
$1.42
Change
-$0.05 (-3.40%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
29.9M
20 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MAPS vs VRAR

Header iconMAPS vs VRAR Comparison
Open Charts MAPS vs VRARBanner chart's image
WM Technology
Price$1.14
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$608.21K
Capitalization122.46M
Glimpse Group (The)
Price$1.42
Change-$0.05 (-3.40%)
Volume$122.63K
Capitalization29.9M
MAPS vs VRAR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MAPS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VRAR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MAPS vs. VRAR commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAPS is a Buy and VRAR is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (MAPS: $1.14 vs. VRAR: $1.42)
Brand notoriety: MAPS and VRAR are both not notable
MAPS represents the Packaged Software, while VRAR is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MAPS: 51% vs. VRAR: 25%
Market capitalization -- MAPS: $122.46M vs. VRAR: $29.9M
MAPS [@Packaged Software] is valued at $122.46M. VRAR’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $29.9M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $313.43B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.76T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.96B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $25.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MAPS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVRAR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MAPS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VRAR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAPS is a better buy in the long-term than VRAR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MAPS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VRAR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MAPS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • VRAR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MAPS is a better buy in the short-term than VRAR.

Price Growth

MAPS (@Packaged Software) experienced а -3.39% price change this week, while VRAR (@Computer Communications) price change was +3.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.41%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +45.44%.

Reported Earning Dates

MAPS is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

VRAR is expected to report earnings on Sep 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-2.19% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Computer Communications (+0.18% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAPS($122M) has a higher market cap than VRAR($29.9M). MAPS YTD gains are higher at: -17.391 vs. VRAR (-40.486). MAPS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 31M vs. VRAR (-3.75M). MAPS has more cash in the bank: 59M vs. VRAR (7.06M). VRAR has less debt than MAPS: VRAR (167K) vs MAPS (28.3M). MAPS has higher revenues than VRAR: MAPS (184M) vs VRAR (8.76M).
MAPSVRARMAPS / VRAR
Capitalization122M29.9M408%
EBITDA31M-3.75M-826%
Gain YTD-17.391-40.48643%
P/E Ratio12.61N/A-
Revenue184M8.76M2,101%
Total Cash59M7.06M836%
Total Debt28.3M167K16,946%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MAPS: Fundamental Ratings
MAPS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
21
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
42
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
75
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
35

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MAPSVRAR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MAPS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VRAR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PCYO10.150.05
+0.50%
Pure Cycle Corp
CLPS1.06N/A
+0.08%
CLPS Incorporation
PNC205.42-2.02
-0.97%
PNC Financial Services Group
HWC62.26-0.66
-1.05%
Hancock Whitney Corp
GRC42.18-0.59
-1.38%
Gorman-Rupp Company (The)

MAPS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MAPS and ACMLF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAPS and ACMLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAPS
1D Price
Change %
MAPS100%
-8.06%
ACMLF - MAPS
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VRAR - MAPS
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.68%
VERB - MAPS
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DSP - MAPS
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.21%
MLNK - MAPS
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.25%
More

VRAR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VRAR has been loosely correlated with NUKK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VRAR jumps, then NUKK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VRAR
1D Price
Change %
VRAR100%
-0.68%
NUKK - VRAR
47%
Loosely correlated
+9.86%
RDZN - VRAR
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.39%
MAPS - VRAR
29%
Poorly correlated
-8.06%
AISP - VRAR
28%
Poorly correlated
-4.92%
NXPL - VRAR
27%
Poorly correlated
-6.53%
More