Advertisement
MAPS vs MLNK
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAPS is a Hold and MLNK is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MAPS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMLNK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- MAPS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- MLNK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MAPS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLNK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MAPS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MLNK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
MAPS (@Packaged Software) experienced а +26.57% price change this week, while MLNK (@Packaged Software) price change was +24.69% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.86%.
Reported Earning Dates
MAPS is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.
MLNK is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+0.20% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| MAPS | MLNK | MAPS / MLNK | |
| Capitalization | 127M | 1.47B | 9% |
| EBITDA | 30.5M | 68.3M | 45% |
| Gain YTD | -14.493 | -4.116 | 352% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.11 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 185M | 320M | 58% |
| Total Cash | 53.3M | 129M | 41% |
| Total Debt | 29.2M | 468M | 6% |
MAPS | MLNK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 49 Fair valued | 94 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 38 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 41 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 73 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 20 | 36 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MAPS's Valuation (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MLNK (94) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that MAPS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MLNK’s over the last 12 months.
MLNK's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAPS (100) in the null industry. This means that MLNK’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAPS’s over the last 12 months.
MAPS's SMR Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MLNK (93) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that MAPS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MLNK’s over the last 12 months.
MAPS's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as MLNK (45) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that MAPS’s stock grew similarly to MLNK’s over the last 12 months.
MLNK's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for MAPS (73) in the null industry. This means that MLNK’s stock grew significantly faster than MAPS’s over the last 12 months.
| MAPS | MLNK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 59% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 77% | 27 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 11 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 78% |
Advertisement
MAPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MAPS and ACMLF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAPS and ACMLF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MAPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAPS | 100% | -5.60% | ||
| ACMLF - MAPS | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| VRAR - MAPS | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| VERB - MAPS | 27% Poorly correlated | +23.69% | ||
| MLNK - MAPS | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DOCN - MAPS | 25% Poorly correlated | +1.64% | ||
More | ||||
MLNK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLNK has been loosely correlated with EVCM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MLNK jumps, then EVCM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MLNK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLNK | 100% | N/A | ||
| EVCM - MLNK | 52% Loosely correlated | +2.66% | ||
| DOX - MLNK | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.01% | ||
| BGOPF - MLNK | 47% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| SMSZF - MLNK | 47% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| GEN - MLNK | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.13% | ||
More | ||||