Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MAPOX vs RLBAX
MAPOX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts MAPOX vs RLBAX
Mairs & Power Balanced
Price$112.76
Change+$0.37 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets700.1M
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$36.91
Change-$0.14 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets255.61B
MAPOX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MAPOX vs. RLBAX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAPOX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 256B vs. MAPOX (700M). MAPOX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: MAPOX (2.06) vs RLBAX (1.17). MAPOX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: MAPOX (65 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than MAPOX (0.71). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. MAPOX (10.89). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MAPOX: RLBAX (250) vs MAPOX (2500). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.99 vs. MAPOX (5.41). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.32 vs. MAPOX (25.24).
| MAPOX | RLBAX | MAPOX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.31 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.31 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.361 | 8.801 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 700M | 256B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.06 | 1.17 | 177% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.41 | 5.99 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.98 | 28.07 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.24 | 33.32 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.52 | 64.40 | 105% |