Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MAPOX vs RLBAX
MAPOX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts MAPOX vs RLBAX
Mairs & Power Balanced
Price$114.43
Change+$0.64 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets699.78M
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.14
Change+$0.10 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.04B
MAPOX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MAPOX vs. RLBAX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAPOX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 262B vs. MAPOX (700M). MAPOX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: MAPOX (2.01) vs RLBAX (1.15). MAPOX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: MAPOX (65 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than MAPOX (0.71). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. MAPOX (10.89). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MAPOX: RLBAX (250) vs MAPOX (2500). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.27 vs. MAPOX (4.79). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.00 vs. MAPOX (28.46).
| MAPOX | RLBAX | MAPOX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.31 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.31 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.907 | 12.531 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 700M | 262B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.01 | 1.15 | 175% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.79 | 7.27 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.46 | 48.19 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.46 | 40.00 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.74 | 74.51 | 102% |