Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MAPOX vs RLBAX
MAPOX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts MAPOX vs RLBAX
Mairs & Power Balanced
Price$111.91
Change+$0.35 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets702.75M
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$36.83
Change+$0.08 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets254.37B
MAPOX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MAPOX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAPOX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 254B vs. MAPOX (703M). MAPOX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: MAPOX (2.06) vs RLBAX (1.18). MAPOX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: MAPOX (65 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than MAPOX (0.71). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. MAPOX (10.89). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MAPOX: RLBAX (250) vs MAPOX (2500). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.42 vs. MAPOX (6.51). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.28 vs. MAPOX (27.22).
| MAPOX | RLBAX | MAPOX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.31 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.31 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.575 | 8.565 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 703M | 254B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.06 | 1.18 | 175% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.51 | 9.42 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.53 | 32.14 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.22 | 35.28 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.33 | 58.06 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement