MAMA
Price
$10.81
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
437.79M
81 days until earnings call
SAPIF
Price
$23.83
Change
-$0.09 (-0.38%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
9.9B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MAMA vs SAPIF

Header iconMAMA vs SAPIF Comparison
Open Charts MAMA vs SAPIFBanner chart's image
Mama's Creations
Price$10.81
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$222.85K
Capitalization437.79M
Saputo
Price$23.83
Change-$0.09 (-0.38%)
Volume$67.57K
Capitalization9.9B
MAMA vs SAPIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MAMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAPIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MAMA vs. SAPIF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAMA is a Buy and SAPIF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (MAMA: $10.81 vs. SAPIF: $23.83)
Brand notoriety: MAMA and SAPIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MAMA: 81% vs. SAPIF: 126%
Market capitalization -- MAMA: $437.79M vs. SAPIF: $9.9B
MAMA [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $437.79M. SAPIF’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $9.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $229.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $6.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MAMA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSAPIF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MAMA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SAPIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAMA is a better buy in the long-term than SAPIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MAMA’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAPIF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MAMA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SAPIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MAMA is a better buy in the short-term than SAPIF.

Price Growth

MAMA (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +3.10% price change this week, while SAPIF (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was -2.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -1.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +183.97%.

Reported Earning Dates

MAMA is expected to report earnings on Dec 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-1.98% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SAPIF($9.9B) has a higher market cap than MAMA($438M). MAMA has higher P/E ratio than SAPIF: MAMA (98.27) vs SAPIF (42.57). SAPIF YTD gains are higher at: 37.802 vs. MAMA (35.930). SAPIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 767M vs. MAMA (7.9M). SAPIF has more cash in the bank: 256M vs. MAMA (12M). MAMA has less debt than SAPIF: MAMA (12.8M) vs SAPIF (3.52B). SAPIF has higher revenues than MAMA: SAPIF (19.1B) vs MAMA (129M).
MAMASAPIFMAMA / SAPIF
Capitalization438M9.9B4%
EBITDA7.9M767M1%
Gain YTD35.93037.80295%
P/E Ratio98.2742.57231%
Revenue129M19.1B1%
Total Cash12M256M5%
Total Debt12.8M3.52B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MAMA vs SAPIF: Fundamental Ratings
MAMA
SAPIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1887
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
20100
SMR RATING
1..100
4792
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3947
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1024
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SAPIF's Valuation (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAMA (91). This means that SAPIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAMA’s over the last 12 months.

MAMA's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SAPIF (100). This means that MAMA’s stock grew significantly faster than SAPIF’s over the last 12 months.

MAMA's SMR Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAPIF (92). This means that MAMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAPIF’s over the last 12 months.

MAMA's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as SAPIF (47). This means that MAMA’s stock grew similarly to SAPIF’s over the last 12 months.

MAMA's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as SAPIF (24). This means that MAMA’s stock grew similarly to SAPIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MAMASAPIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MAMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAPIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PCRB49.29-0.09
-0.18%
Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF
VNQ90.15-0.25
-0.28%
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
VPV10.48-0.05
-0.48%
Invesco Pennsylvania Value Municipal Income Trust
CCSO24.66-0.19
-0.77%
Carbon Collective Climate Sol US Eq ETF
GIND26.13-0.69
-2.57%
Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF

MAMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MAMA and JBSS have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAMA and JBSS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAMA
1D Price
Change %
MAMA100%
+0.09%
JBSS - MAMA
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.69%
DAR - MAMA
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
STKL - MAMA
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.14%
BYND - MAMA
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.07%
MZTI - MAMA
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.32%
More

SAPIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SAPIF and ASBFY have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SAPIF and ASBFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAPIF
1D Price
Change %
SAPIF100%
N/A
ASBFY - SAPIF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAMA - SAPIF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
RSGUF - SAPIF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PRBZF - SAPIF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TATYF - SAPIF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More