MAMA
Price
$10.28
Change
-$0.04 (-0.39%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
416.73M
32 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NOMD
Price
$12.19
Change
+$0.06 (+0.49%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.79B
97 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MAMA vs NOMD

Header iconMAMA vs NOMD Comparison
Open Charts MAMA vs NOMDBanner chart's image
Mama's Creations
Price$10.28
Change-$0.04 (-0.39%)
Volume$203.94K
Capitalization416.73M
Nomad Foods
Price$12.19
Change+$0.06 (+0.49%)
Volume$1.96M
Capitalization1.79B
MAMA vs NOMD Comparison Chart in %
MAMA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NOMD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MAMA vs. NOMD commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAMA is a Hold and NOMD is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (MAMA: $10.28 vs. NOMD: $12.19)
Brand notoriety: MAMA and NOMD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MAMA: 70% vs. NOMD: 92%
Market capitalization -- MAMA: $416.73M vs. NOMD: $1.79B
MAMA [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $416.73M. NOMD’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $1.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $261.45B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MAMA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNOMD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MAMA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NOMD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAMA is a better buy in the long-term than NOMD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MAMA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NOMD’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MAMA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NOMD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NOMD is a better buy in the short-term than MAMA.

Price Growth

MAMA (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -3.75% price change this week, while NOMD (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was +2.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +0.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

MAMA is expected to report earnings on Dec 16, 2025.

NOMD is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (+0.85% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NOMD($1.79B) has a higher market cap than MAMA($417M). MAMA has higher P/E ratio than NOMD: MAMA (93.55) vs NOMD (8.15). MAMA YTD gains are higher at: 29.648 vs. NOMD (-24.514). NOMD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 464M vs. MAMA (8.38M). NOMD has higher revenues than MAMA: NOMD (3.05B) vs MAMA (136M).
MAMANOMDMAMA / NOMD
Capitalization417M1.79B23%
EBITDA8.38M464M2%
Gain YTD29.648-24.514-121%
P/E Ratio93.558.151,147%
Revenue136M3.05B4%
Total Cash9.38MN/A-
Total Debt10.5MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MAMA vs NOMD: Fundamental Ratings
MAMA
NOMD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7811
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
23100
SMR RATING
1..100
4993
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4381
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1384
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NOMD's Valuation (9) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is significantly better than the same rating for MAMA (91) in the null industry. This means that NOMD’s stock grew significantly faster than MAMA’s over the last 12 months.

MAMA's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NOMD (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MAMA’s stock grew significantly faster than NOMD’s over the last 12 months.

MAMA's SMR Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOMD (93) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MAMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than NOMD’s over the last 12 months.

MAMA's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOMD (81) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MAMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than NOMD’s over the last 12 months.

MAMA's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NOMD (84) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MAMA’s stock grew significantly faster than NOMD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MAMANOMD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MAMA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NOMD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GIEYX17.370.07
+0.40%
GuideStone Funds International Eq Instl
MASMX10.210.04
+0.39%
Madison Small Cap A
IPEAX5.310.02
+0.38%
Voya Large Cap Value Port A
FZALX30.77N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Z
HLXCX9.91-2.93
-22.82%
Harding Loevner Emer Mkt ex Chn Instl

MAMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MAMA and DAR have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAMA and DAR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAMA
1D Price
Change %
MAMA100%
+0.39%
DAR - MAMA
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
NOMD - MAMA
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.51%
STKL - MAMA
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.72%
SMPL - MAMA
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.73%
BYND - MAMA
21%
Poorly correlated
-8.61%
More

NOMD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOMD has been loosely correlated with KHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NOMD jumps, then KHC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NOMD
1D Price
Change %
NOMD100%
+1.51%
KHC - NOMD
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
MKC - NOMD
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.26%
POST - NOMD
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
CPB - NOMD
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.20%
MDLZ - NOMD
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
More