MAMA
Price
$9.44
Change
+$0.04 (+0.43%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
355.04M
2 days until earnings call
NFPDF
Price
$18.93
Change
-$0.17 (-0.89%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
5.55B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MAMA vs NFPDF

Header iconMAMA vs NFPDF Comparison
Open Charts MAMA vs NFPDFBanner chart's image
Mama's Creations
Price$9.44
Change+$0.04 (+0.43%)
Volume$157.8K
Capitalization355.04M
Nissin Food Products
Price$18.93
Change-$0.17 (-0.89%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization5.55B
MAMA vs NFPDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MAMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NFPDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MAMA vs. NFPDF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAMA is a Hold and NFPDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (MAMA: $9.44 vs. NFPDF: $18.93)
Brand notoriety: MAMA and NFPDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MAMA: 77% vs. NFPDF: 39%
Market capitalization -- MAMA: $355.04M vs. NFPDF: $5.55B
MAMA [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $355.04M. NFPDF’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $5.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $241.32B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MAMA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNFPDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MAMA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NFPDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAMA is a better buy in the long-term than NFPDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MAMA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NFPDF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MAMA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NFPDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MAMA and NFPDF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MAMA (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +18.30% price change this week, while NFPDF (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +895.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

MAMA is expected to report earnings on Sep 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.34% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NFPDF($5.55B) has a higher market cap than MAMA($355M). MAMA has higher P/E ratio than NFPDF: MAMA (85.82) vs NFPDF (15.29). MAMA YTD gains are higher at: 18.593 vs. NFPDF (-28.566). NFPDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 107B vs. MAMA (7.9M). NFPDF has more cash in the bank: 94.6B vs. MAMA (12M). MAMA has less debt than NFPDF: MAMA (12.8M) vs NFPDF (78.4B). NFPDF has higher revenues than MAMA: NFPDF (761B) vs MAMA (129M).
MAMANFPDFMAMA / NFPDF
Capitalization355M5.55B6%
EBITDA7.9M107B0%
Gain YTD18.593-28.566-65%
P/E Ratio85.8215.29561%
Revenue129M761B0%
Total Cash12M94.6B0%
Total Debt12.8M78.4B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MAMA vs NFPDF: Fundamental Ratings
MAMA
NFPDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2094
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
24100
SMR RATING
1..100
479
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4080
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1478
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8530

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NFPDF's Valuation (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAMA (91). This means that NFPDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAMA’s over the last 12 months.

MAMA's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NFPDF (100). This means that MAMA’s stock grew significantly faster than NFPDF’s over the last 12 months.

NFPDF's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAMA (47). This means that NFPDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAMA’s over the last 12 months.

MAMA's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NFPDF (80). This means that MAMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than NFPDF’s over the last 12 months.

MAMA's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NFPDF (78). This means that MAMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than NFPDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MAMANFPDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
7%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
20%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
8%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
11%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
20%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
78%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MAMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NFPDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QTUM95.271.10
+1.17%
Defiance Quantum ETF
GHYB45.560.09
+0.19%
Goldman Sachs Access Hi Yld Corp Bd ETF
PFL8.55N/A
N/A
PIMCO Income Strategy Fund
SPDG39.91-0.01
-0.03%
SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Netrl Div ETF
KQQQ28.26-0.01
-0.05%
Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF

MAMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MAMA and JBSS have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAMA and JBSS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAMA
1D Price
Change %
MAMA100%
+0.43%
JBSS - MAMA
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.07%
DAR - MAMA
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.49%
SMPL - MAMA
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.28%
STKL - MAMA
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.49%
BYND - MAMA
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.68%
More

NFPDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NFPDF and ARRT have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NFPDF and ARRT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NFPDF
1D Price
Change %
NFPDF100%
N/A
ARRT - NFPDF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAMA - NFPDF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
NCRA - NFPDF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.15%
LYSFY - NFPDF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MRRTY - NFPDF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
More