Advertisement
MAMA vs NATR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAMA is a Buy and NATR is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MAMA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNATR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- MAMA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- NATR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MAMA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NATR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MAMA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- NATR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
MAMA (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +4.67% price change this week, while NATR (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was +7.47% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +1.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +238.76%.
Reported Earning Dates
MAMA is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2026.
NATR is expected to report earnings on Mar 18, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Major Diversified (+1.51% weekly)Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.
| MAMA | NATR | MAMA / NATR | |
| Capitalization | 628M | 453M | 139% |
| EBITDA | 9.98M | 40.4M | 25% |
| Gain YTD | 14.529 | 20.019 | 73% |
| P/E Ratio | 128.69 | 31.98 | 402% |
| Revenue | 151M | 475M | 32% |
| Total Cash | 18.1M | 95.6M | 19% |
| Total Debt | 16M | 14.3M | 112% |
MAMA | NATR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 76 | 23 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 91 Overvalued | 79 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 54 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 60 | 72 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 22 | 10 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NATR's Valuation (79) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as MAMA (91) in the null industry. This means that NATR’s stock grew similarly to MAMA’s over the last 12 months.
MAMA's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NATR (54) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MAMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than NATR’s over the last 12 months.
MAMA's SMR Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as NATR (72) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MAMA’s stock grew similarly to NATR’s over the last 12 months.
MAMA's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as NATR (37) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MAMA’s stock grew similarly to NATR’s over the last 12 months.
NATR's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as MAMA (22) in the null industry. This means that NATR’s stock grew similarly to MAMA’s over the last 12 months.
| MAMA | NATR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 77% | 10 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 1 day ago 81% |
Advertisement
MAMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAMA has been loosely correlated with JBSS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MAMA jumps, then JBSS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MAMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAMA | 100% | +0.46% | ||
| JBSS - MAMA | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.39% | ||
| NATR - MAMA | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.19% | ||
| HLF - MAMA | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| FRPT - MAMA | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.99% | ||
| DAR - MAMA | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.21% | ||
More | ||||
NATR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NATR has been loosely correlated with HLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NATR jumps, then HLF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NATR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NATR | 100% | +0.19% | ||
| HLF - NATR | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| FRPT - NATR | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.99% | ||
| THS - NATR | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| JBS - NATR | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.69% | ||
| BGS - NATR | 28% Poorly correlated | +3.57% | ||
More | ||||