MAKOF
Price
$5.25
Change
+$0.15 (+2.94%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
421.91M
STLRF
Price
$1.02
Change
+$0.04 (+4.08%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
126.82M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MAKOF vs STLRF

Header iconMAKOF vs STLRF Comparison
Open Charts MAKOF vs STLRFBanner chart's image
Mako Mining
Price$5.25
Change+$0.15 (+2.94%)
Volume$38.16K
Capitalization421.91M
STLLR GOLD
Price$1.02
Change+$0.04 (+4.08%)
Volume$27.43K
Capitalization126.82M
MAKOF vs STLRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MAKOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STLRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MAKOF vs. STLRF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAKOF is a StrongBuy and STLRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (MAKOF: $5.25 vs. STLRF: $1.02)
Brand notoriety: MAKOF and STLRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MAKOF: 113% vs. STLRF: 60%
Market capitalization -- MAKOF: $421.91M vs. STLRF: $126.82M
MAKOF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $421.91M. STLRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $126.82M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $102.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MAKOF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSTLRF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MAKOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • STLRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAKOF is a better buy in the long-term than STLRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MAKOF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STLRF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MAKOF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • STLRF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MAKOF and STLRF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MAKOF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +4.17% price change this week, while STLRF (@Precious Metals) price change was +5.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +7.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +32.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6013.73%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+7.02% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAKOF($422M) has a higher market cap than STLRF($127M). MAKOF YTD gains are higher at: 138.095 vs. STLRF (77.376). MAKOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 48.4M vs. STLRF (-33.09M). MAKOF has more cash in the bank: 28.9M vs. STLRF (15.9M). STLRF has less debt than MAKOF: STLRF (1.2M) vs MAKOF (5.38M). MAKOF has higher revenues than STLRF: MAKOF (115M) vs STLRF (0).
MAKOFSTLRFMAKOF / STLRF
Capitalization422M127M332%
EBITDA48.4M-33.09M-146%
Gain YTD138.09577.376178%
P/E Ratio18.75N/A-
Revenue115M0-
Total Cash28.9M15.9M182%
Total Debt5.38M1.2M450%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MAKOF vs STLRF: Fundamental Ratings
MAKOF
STLRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1773
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
64100
SMR RATING
1..100
2796
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3838
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

STLRF's Valuation (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAKOF (69). This means that STLRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAKOF’s over the last 12 months.

MAKOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STLRF (100). This means that MAKOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than STLRF’s over the last 12 months.

MAKOF's SMR Rating (27) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for STLRF (96). This means that MAKOF’s stock grew significantly faster than STLRF’s over the last 12 months.

MAKOF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as STLRF (38). This means that MAKOF’s stock grew similarly to STLRF’s over the last 12 months.

MAKOF's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for STLRF (100). This means that MAKOF’s stock grew significantly faster than STLRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MAKOFSTLRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MAKOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STLRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PMVEX26.830.30
+1.13%
PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Val R2
NOINX17.240.14
+0.82%
Northern International Equity Index
IDIVX20.420.14
+0.70%
Integrity Dividend Harvest A
FEVCX22.550.10
+0.45%
First Eagle US C
SSYGX43.86N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Small Cap Gr Y

MAKOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MAKOF and CGLCF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAKOF and CGLCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAKOF
1D Price
Change %
MAKOF100%
+2.90%
CGLCF - MAKOF
26%
Poorly correlated
+4.84%
HSTXF - MAKOF
23%
Poorly correlated
+4.00%
TRX - MAKOF
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.95%
STLRF - MAKOF
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.08%
NFLDF - MAKOF
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.06%
More

STLRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STLRF has been loosely correlated with NSUPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STLRF jumps, then NSUPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STLRF
1D Price
Change %
STLRF100%
+4.08%
NSUPF - STLRF
36%
Loosely correlated
+6.26%
TORXF - STLRF
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.82%
CGLCF - STLRF
35%
Loosely correlated
+4.84%
SMAGF - STLRF
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.38%
MAUTF - STLRF
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.39%
More