MAIN
Price
$58.89
Change
-$0.25 (-0.42%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.3B
98 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SII
Price
$88.69
Change
-$3.42 (-3.71%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.38B
99 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MAIN vs SII

Header iconMAIN vs SII Comparison
Open Charts MAIN vs SIIBanner chart's image
Main Street Capital
Price$58.89
Change-$0.25 (-0.42%)
Volume$1.47K
Capitalization5.3B
Sprott
Price$88.69
Change-$3.42 (-3.71%)
Volume$600
Capitalization2.38B
MAIN vs SII Comparison Chart in %
MAIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SII
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MAIN vs. SII commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAIN is a Buy and SII is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (MAIN: $59.14 vs. SII: $92.11)
Brand notoriety: MAIN and SII are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MAIN: 55% vs. SII: 88%
Market capitalization -- MAIN: $5.28B vs. SII: $2.29B
MAIN [@Investment Managers] is valued at $5.28B. SII’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $2.29B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $165.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MAIN’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSII’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MAIN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SII’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAIN is a better buy in the long-term than SII.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MAIN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SII’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MAIN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SII’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MAIN is a better buy in the short-term than SII.

Price Growth

MAIN (@Investment Managers) experienced а +3.84% price change this week, while SII (@Investment Managers) price change was +9.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

MAIN is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

SII is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.56% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAIN($5.3B) has a higher market cap than SII($2.38B). SII has higher P/E ratio than MAIN: SII (46.99) vs MAIN (9.79). SII YTD gains are higher at: 122.090 vs. MAIN (7.456). SII has less debt than MAIN: SII (18.7M) vs MAIN (2.22B). MAIN has higher revenues than SII: MAIN (623M) vs SII (186M).
MAINSIIMAIN / SII
Capitalization5.3B2.38B223%
EBITDAN/A73.9M-
Gain YTD7.456122.0906%
P/E Ratio9.7946.9921%
Revenue623M186M335%
Total CashN/A75.4M-
Total Debt2.22B18.7M11,856%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MAIN vs SII: Fundamental Ratings
MAIN
SII
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1922
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1015
SMR RATING
1..100
1654
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5037
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
418
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MAIN's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as SII (31). This means that MAIN’s stock grew similarly to SII’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as SII (15). This means that MAIN’s stock grew similarly to SII’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's SMR Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SII (54). This means that MAIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than SII’s over the last 12 months.

SII's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as MAIN (50). This means that SII’s stock grew similarly to MAIN’s over the last 12 months.

SII's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAIN (41). This means that SII’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAIN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MAINSII
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MAIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SII
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LMRIX29.790.21
+0.71%
1919 Financial Services I
SMCWX75.410.16
+0.21%
American Funds SMALLCAP World A
NMVLX12.16N/A
N/A
Nuance Mid Cap Value Institutional
VCNIX27.60-0.01
-0.04%
VALIC Company I NASDAQ-100 Index
FSGAX48.78-0.19
-0.39%
Franklin Small-Mid Cap Growth Adv

MAIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAIN has been closely correlated with ARCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAIN jumps, then ARCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAIN
1D Price
Change %
MAIN100%
-0.14%
ARCC - MAIN
82%
Closely correlated
+0.34%
HTGC - MAIN
79%
Closely correlated
-1.67%
BCSF - MAIN
77%
Closely correlated
+2.04%
GBDC - MAIN
77%
Closely correlated
+0.65%
FDUS - MAIN
76%
Closely correlated
+0.20%
More

SII and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SII has been loosely correlated with BK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SII jumps, then BK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SII
1D Price
Change %
SII100%
-1.02%
BK - SII
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.25%
ARCC - SII
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.34%
MAIN - SII
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
BLK - SII
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
BN - SII
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.58%
More