MAIN
Price
$65.65
Change
-$0.87 (-1.31%)
Updated
Sep 8, 01:10 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.95B
52 days until earnings call
OXSQ
Price
$2.18
Change
-$0.02 (-0.91%)
Updated
Sep 8, 01:20 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
171.68M
64 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MAIN vs OXSQ

Header iconMAIN vs OXSQ Comparison
Open Charts MAIN vs OXSQBanner chart's image
Main Street Capital
Price$65.65
Change-$0.87 (-1.31%)
Volume$200
Capitalization5.95B
Oxford Square Capital
Price$2.18
Change-$0.02 (-0.91%)
Volume$5.33K
Capitalization171.68M
MAIN vs OXSQ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MAIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OXSQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MAIN vs. OXSQ commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAIN is a Buy and OXSQ is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (MAIN: $66.52 vs. OXSQ: $2.20)
Brand notoriety: MAIN and OXSQ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MAIN: 110% vs. OXSQ: 78%
Market capitalization -- MAIN: $5.95B vs. OXSQ: $171.68M
MAIN [@Investment Managers] is valued at $5.95B. OXSQ’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $171.68M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MAIN’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileOXSQ’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MAIN’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • OXSQ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAIN is a better buy in the long-term than OXSQ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MAIN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OXSQ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MAIN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • OXSQ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MAIN is a better buy in the short-term than OXSQ.

Price Growth

MAIN (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.35% price change this week, while OXSQ (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +44.82%.

Reported Earning Dates

MAIN is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

OXSQ is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.26% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAIN($5.95B) has a higher market cap than OXSQ($172M). OXSQ has higher P/E ratio than MAIN: OXSQ (28.33) vs MAIN (10.94). MAIN YTD gains are higher at: 18.829 vs. OXSQ (0.789). OXSQ has less debt than MAIN: OXSQ (124M) vs MAIN (2.22B).
MAINOXSQMAIN / OXSQ
Capitalization5.95B172M3,459%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD18.8290.7892,386%
P/E Ratio10.9428.3339%
Revenue623MN/A-
Total CashN/A275K-
Total Debt2.22B124M1,788%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MAIN vs OXSQ: Fundamental Ratings
MAIN
OXSQ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
753
SMR RATING
1..100
1691
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4563
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
316
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OXSQ's Valuation (4) in the null industry is in the same range as MAIN (14). This means that OXSQ’s stock grew similarly to MAIN’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OXSQ (53). This means that MAIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than OXSQ’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's SMR Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for OXSQ (91). This means that MAIN’s stock grew significantly faster than OXSQ’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as OXSQ (63). This means that MAIN’s stock grew similarly to OXSQ’s over the last 12 months.

OXSQ's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as MAIN (31). This means that OXSQ’s stock grew similarly to MAIN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MAINOXSQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
35%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MAIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OXSQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PCRHY10.350.15
+1.47%
Panasonic Holdings Corporation
FBTT18.25N/A
N/A
First Bankers Trustshares, Inc.
KLKNF6.22N/A
N/A
Kloeckner & Co Ag
MNRIF0.29N/A
N/A
Minor International Public Co., Ltd.
CNADF0.06N/A
N/A
CANADABIS CAP INC

MAIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAIN has been closely correlated with ARCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAIN jumps, then ARCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAIN
1D Price
Change %
MAIN100%
-0.11%
ARCC - MAIN
79%
Closely correlated
+0.31%
OBDC - MAIN
78%
Closely correlated
-0.14%
GLAD - MAIN
77%
Closely correlated
-0.61%
BXSL - MAIN
75%
Closely correlated
-0.78%
GBDC - MAIN
75%
Closely correlated
-0.27%
More

OXSQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OXSQ has been loosely correlated with PNNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OXSQ jumps, then PNNT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OXSQ
1D Price
Change %
OXSQ100%
N/A
PNNT - OXSQ
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
FDUS - OXSQ
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MFIC - OXSQ
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.38%
BBDC - OXSQ
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.21%
MAIN - OXSQ
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
More