MAIN
Price
$63.75
Change
+$0.03 (+0.05%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
5.7B
32 days until earnings call
MRCC
Price
$7.00
Change
+$0.01 (+0.14%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
151.66M
38 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MAIN vs MRCC

Header iconMAIN vs MRCC Comparison
Open Charts MAIN vs MRCCBanner chart's image
Main Street Capital
Price$63.75
Change+$0.03 (+0.05%)
Volume$382.73K
Capitalization5.7B
Monroe Capital
Price$7.00
Change+$0.01 (+0.14%)
Volume$65.38K
Capitalization151.66M
MAIN vs MRCC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MAIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MRCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MAIN vs. MRCC commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAIN is a StrongBuy and MRCC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (MAIN: $63.75 vs. MRCC: $7.00)
Brand notoriety: MAIN and MRCC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MAIN: 70% vs. MRCC: 58%
Market capitalization -- MAIN: $5.7B vs. MRCC: $151.66M
MAIN [@Investment Managers] is valued at $5.7B. MRCC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $151.66M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $179.08B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MAIN’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMRCC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MAIN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MRCC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAIN is a better buy in the long-term than MRCC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MAIN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MRCC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MAIN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MRCC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MRCC is a better buy in the short-term than MAIN.

Price Growth

MAIN (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.09% price change this week, while MRCC (@Investment Managers) price change was -5.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -1.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +39.07%.

Reported Earning Dates

MAIN is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

MRCC is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-1.95% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAIN($5.7B) has a higher market cap than MRCC($152M). MRCC has higher P/E ratio than MAIN: MRCC (77.78) vs MAIN (10.49). MAIN YTD gains are higher at: 14.840 vs. MRCC (-8.745). MRCC has less debt than MAIN: MRCC (209M) vs MAIN (2.22B).
MAINMRCCMAIN / MRCC
Capitalization5.7B152M3,751%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD14.840-8.745-170%
P/E Ratio10.4977.7813%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/A5.32M-
Total Debt2.22B209M1,061%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MAIN vs MRCC: Fundamental Ratings
MAIN
MRCC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8684
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
734
SMR RATING
1..100
1687
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4855
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
354
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MRCC's Valuation (5) in the null industry is in the same range as MAIN (14). This means that MRCC’s stock grew similarly to MAIN’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as MRCC (34). This means that MAIN’s stock grew similarly to MRCC’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's SMR Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MRCC (87). This means that MAIN’s stock grew significantly faster than MRCC’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as MRCC (55). This means that MAIN’s stock grew similarly to MRCC’s over the last 12 months.

MRCC's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as MAIN (35). This means that MRCC’s stock grew similarly to MAIN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MAINMRCC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MAIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MRCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DNLCX54.470.62
+1.15%
BNY Mellon Active MidCap C
BUFMX16.800.15
+0.90%
Buffalo Mid Cap Growth
HRSMX86.460.67
+0.78%
Hood River Small-Cap Growth Instl
RICAX65.660.30
+0.46%
American Funds Invmt Co of Amer R1
GABGX129.630.31
+0.24%
Gabelli Growth AAA

MAIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAIN has been closely correlated with ARCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAIN jumps, then ARCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAIN
1D Price
Change %
MAIN100%
+0.05%
ARCC - MAIN
79%
Closely correlated
-0.49%
OBDC - MAIN
78%
Closely correlated
-0.97%
GBDC - MAIN
76%
Closely correlated
+0.29%
BXSL - MAIN
76%
Closely correlated
-1.17%
HTGC - MAIN
75%
Closely correlated
+0.05%
More

MRCC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MRCC has been loosely correlated with BCSF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MRCC jumps, then BCSF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MRCC
1D Price
Change %
MRCC100%
+0.14%
BCSF - MRCC
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.42%
MAIN - MRCC
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
FDUS - MRCC
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.42%
CION - MRCC
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
TSLX - MRCC
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.35%
More