Advertisement
MAGS vs META
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAGS is a Hold and META is a Buy.
META | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 53 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 25 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 24 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 18 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 39 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| MAGS | META | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 55% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 58% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 20 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 51% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 80% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CSHNX | 11.52 | 0.06 | +0.52% |
| NYLI Cushing® MLP Premier Investor Class | |||
| HIAHX | 15.64 | -0.09 | -0.57% |
| Hartford Healthcare HLS IA | |||
| AYBLX | 11.36 | -0.10 | -0.87% |
| Victory Pioneer Balanced Y | |||
| RWBEX | 68.44 | -0.73 | -1.06% |
| American Funds Capital World Gr&Inc R2E | |||
| GSDPX | 46.91 | -0.61 | -1.28% |
| Goldman Sachs US Tax-Managed Eq P | |||
MAGS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAGS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAGS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MAGS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAGS | 100% | -0.67% | ||
| AMZN - MAGS | 78% Closely correlated | -0.53% | ||
| META - MAGS | 74% Closely correlated | -1.51% | ||
| MSFT - MAGS | 73% Closely correlated | -0.82% | ||
| GOOGL - MAGS | 66% Closely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| AAPL - MAGS | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.38% | ||
More | ||||
META and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, META has been loosely correlated with GOOGL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if META jumps, then GOOGL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To META | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| META | 100% | -1.51% | ||
| GOOGL - META | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| GOOG - META | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.62% | ||
| PINS - META | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.53% | ||
| DASH - META | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.09% | ||
| SNAP - META | 53% Loosely correlated | -4.34% | ||
More | ||||