Advertisement
MAGN vs SLVM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAGN is a Hold and SLVM is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MAGN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSLVM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- MAGN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- SLVM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MAGN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLVM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MAGN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SLVM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
MAGN (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -4.33% price change this week, while SLVM (@Pulp & Paper) price change was +10.02% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +3.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.03%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was +3.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.90%.
Reported Earning Dates
MAGN is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.
SLVM is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Household/Personal Care (+3.82% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
@Pulp & Paper (+3.36% weekly)The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.
| MAGN | SLVM | MAGN / SLVM | |
| Capitalization | 535M | 2.06B | 26% |
| EBITDA | 67.1M | 473M | 14% |
| Gain YTD | -3.567 | 9.610 | -37% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 12.02 | - |
| Revenue | 1.31B | 3.43B | 38% |
| Total Cash | 276M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 2.05B | 808M | 253% |
MAGN | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 21 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 3 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| MAGN | SLVM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 85% | 8 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 65% |
Advertisement
MAGN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAGN has been loosely correlated with SPB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MAGN jumps, then SPB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MAGN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAGN | 100% | -0.88% | ||
| SPB - MAGN | 43% Loosely correlated | +1.19% | ||
| HELE - MAGN | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| EL - MAGN | 35% Loosely correlated | +2.08% | ||
| MATV - MAGN | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.38% | ||
| SLVM - MAGN | 31% Poorly correlated | +3.32% | ||
More | ||||
SLVM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLVM has been loosely correlated with CLW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLVM jumps, then CLW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SLVM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLVM | 100% | +3.32% | ||
| CLW - SLVM | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.34% | ||
| MAGN - SLVM | 33% Loosely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| MERC - SLVM | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.57% | ||
| MATV - SLVM | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.38% | ||
| SEOAY - SLVM | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.08% | ||
More | ||||