MAGN
Price
$9.08
Change
-$0.36 (-3.81%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
336.06M
7 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SEOJF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
6.75B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MAGN vs SEOJF

Header iconMAGN vs SEOJF Comparison
Open Charts MAGN vs SEOJFBanner chart's image
Magnera
Price$9.08
Change-$0.36 (-3.81%)
Volume$3.54K
Capitalization336.06M
Stora Enso Oyj
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$164
Capitalization6.75B
MAGN vs SEOJF Comparison Chart in %
MAGN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MAGN vs. SEOJF commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAGN is a Hold and SEOJF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (MAGN: $9.44 vs. SEOJF: $8.56)
Brand notoriety: MAGN and SEOJF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pulp & Paper industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MAGN: 100% vs. SEOJF: 100%
Market capitalization -- MAGN: $336.06M vs. SEOJF: $6.75B
MAGN [@Pulp & Paper] is valued at $336.06M. SEOJF’s [@Pulp & Paper] market capitalization is $6.75B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pulp & Paper] industry ranges from $14.83B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pulp & Paper] industry is $4.51B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MAGN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSEOJF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MAGN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SEOJF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MAGN and SEOJF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MAGN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MAGN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

MAGN (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а +10.15% price change this week, while SEOJF (@Pulp & Paper) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was +0.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

MAGN is expected to report earnings on Nov 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pulp & Paper (+0.67% weekly)

The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SEOJF($6.75B) has a higher market cap than MAGN($336M). SEOJF YTD gains are higher at: -12.205 vs. MAGN (-48.046). SEOJF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 588M vs. MAGN (67.1M). SEOJF has more cash in the bank: 1.57B vs. MAGN (276M). MAGN has less debt than SEOJF: MAGN (2.05B) vs SEOJF (5.68B). SEOJF has higher revenues than MAGN: SEOJF (9.37B) vs MAGN (1.31B).
MAGNSEOJFMAGN / SEOJF
Capitalization336M6.75B5%
EBITDA67.1M588M11%
Gain YTD-48.046-12.205394%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue1.31B9.37B14%
Total Cash276M1.57B18%
Total Debt2.05B5.68B36%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MAGN vs SEOJF: Fundamental Ratings
MAGN
SEOJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
441
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9691
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8973
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
831
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5055

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MAGN's Valuation (7) in the Pulp And Paper industry is in the same range as SEOJF (33) in the null industry. This means that MAGN’s stock grew similarly to SEOJF’s over the last 12 months.

MAGN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Pulp And Paper industry is in the same range as SEOJF (100) in the null industry. This means that MAGN’s stock grew similarly to SEOJF’s over the last 12 months.

SEOJF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as MAGN (96) in the Pulp And Paper industry. This means that SEOJF’s stock grew similarly to MAGN’s over the last 12 months.

SEOJF's Price Growth Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as MAGN (89) in the Pulp And Paper industry. This means that SEOJF’s stock grew similarly to MAGN’s over the last 12 months.

MAGN's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Pulp And Paper industry is in the same range as SEOJF (31) in the null industry. This means that MAGN’s stock grew similarly to SEOJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MAGNSEOJF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
85%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MAGN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SILXY30.800.45
+1.48%
Silex Systems Ltd.
CHHGF0.23N/A
N/A
Chen Hsong Holdings Ltd.
CHDRF664.03N/A
N/A
Christian Dior S.E.
KYKOF17.13N/A
N/A
Kyowa Hakko Kogyo Co., Ltd.
PXXLF0.25N/A
N/A
Poxel SA

MAGN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAGN has been loosely correlated with SLVM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MAGN jumps, then SLVM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAGN
1D Price
Change %
MAGN100%
+6.07%
SLVM - MAGN
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.21%
MATV - MAGN
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
CLW - MAGN
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.98%
SUZ - MAGN
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.60%
MONDY - MAGN
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.97%
More

SEOJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SEOJF and HLMMF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SEOJF and HLMMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SEOJF
1D Price
Change %
SEOJF100%
N/A
HLMMF - SEOJF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UPMMY - SEOJF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
UPMKF - SEOJF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WBNEF - SEOJF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAGN - SEOJF
1%
Poorly correlated
+6.07%
More