MAGE
Price
$0.22
Change
+$0.07 (+46.67%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
6.01M
MAKOF
Price
$5.25
Change
+$0.15 (+2.94%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
421.91M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MAGE vs MAKOF

Header iconMAGE vs MAKOF Comparison
Open Charts MAGE vs MAKOFBanner chart's image
Magellan Copper and Gold
Price$0.22
Change+$0.07 (+46.67%)
Volume$57.03K
Capitalization6.01M
Mako Mining
Price$5.25
Change+$0.15 (+2.94%)
Volume$38.16K
Capitalization421.91M
MAGE vs MAKOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MAGE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAKOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MAGE vs. MAKOF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAGE is a StrongBuy and MAKOF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (MAGE: $0.15 vs. MAKOF: $5.10)
Brand notoriety: MAGE and MAKOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MAGE: 181% vs. MAKOF: 71%
Market capitalization -- MAGE: $4.11M vs. MAKOF: $416.69M
MAGE [@Precious Metals] is valued at $4.11M. MAKOF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $416.69M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $102.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MAGE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMAKOF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MAGE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MAKOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAKOF is a better buy in the long-term than MAGE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MAGE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAKOF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MAGE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MAKOF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MAGE is a better buy in the short-term than MAKOF.

Price Growth

MAGE (@Precious Metals) experienced а +1.35% price change this week, while MAKOF (@Precious Metals) price change was +1.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +27.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6008.39%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.52% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAKOF($422M) has a higher market cap than MAGE($6.01M). MAGE YTD gains are higher at: 158.353 vs. MAKOF (138.095). MAKOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 48.4M vs. MAGE (-664.43K). MAKOF has more cash in the bank: 28.9M vs. MAGE (589). MAGE has less debt than MAKOF: MAGE (859K) vs MAKOF (5.38M). MAKOF has higher revenues than MAGE: MAKOF (115M) vs MAGE (0).
MAGEMAKOFMAGE / MAKOF
Capitalization6.01M422M1%
EBITDA-664.43K48.4M-1%
Gain YTD158.353138.095115%
P/E RatioN/A18.75-
Revenue0115M-
Total Cash58928.9M0%
Total Debt859K5.38M16%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MAGE vs MAKOF: Fundamental Ratings
MAGE
MAKOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8817
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10064
SMR RATING
1..100
10027
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3938
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1007
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MAKOF's Valuation (69) in the null industry is in the same range as MAGE (95). This means that MAKOF’s stock grew similarly to MAGE’s over the last 12 months.

MAKOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAGE (100). This means that MAKOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAGE’s over the last 12 months.

MAKOF's SMR Rating (27) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MAGE (100). This means that MAKOF’s stock grew significantly faster than MAGE’s over the last 12 months.

MAKOF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as MAGE (39). This means that MAKOF’s stock grew similarly to MAGE’s over the last 12 months.

MAKOF's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MAGE (100). This means that MAKOF’s stock grew significantly faster than MAGE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MAGEMAKOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MAGE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAKOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LSMNX14.400.16
+1.12%
Loomis Sayles Small/Mid Cap Growth N
NBMTX19.210.13
+0.68%
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Tr
VRNIX582.573.61
+0.62%
Vanguard Russell 1000 Index I
DGLYX21.570.12
+0.56%
BNY Mellon Global Stock - Y
NEIMX35.790.13
+0.36%
Neiman Large Cap Value No-Load

MAGE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MAGE and BDLNF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAGE and BDLNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAGE
1D Price
Change %
MAGE100%
+46.40%
BDLNF - MAGE
25%
Poorly correlated
+4.63%
EFRGF - MAGE
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ORLA - MAGE
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.76%
MAKOF - MAGE
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.90%
LONCF - MAGE
-0%
Poorly correlated
+8.25%
More

MAKOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MAKOF and CGLCF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAKOF and CGLCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAKOF
1D Price
Change %
MAKOF100%
+2.90%
CGLCF - MAKOF
26%
Poorly correlated
+4.84%
HSTXF - MAKOF
23%
Poorly correlated
+4.00%
TRX - MAKOF
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.95%
STLRF - MAKOF
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.08%
NFLDF - MAKOF
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.06%
More