MAG
Price
$14.59
Change
-$0.67 (-4.39%)
Updated
Sep 27 closing price
25 days until earnings call
NG
Price
$4.23
Change
-$0.13 (-2.98%)
Updated
Sep 27 closing price
4 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MAG vs NG

Header iconMAG vs NG Comparison
Open Charts MAG vs NGBanner chart's image
MAG Silver
Price$14.59
Change-$0.67 (-4.39%)
Volume$713.68K
CapitalizationN/A
NovaGold Resources
Price$4.23
Change-$0.13 (-2.98%)
Volume$873.78K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
MAG vs NG Comparison Chart
Loading...
MAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
NG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
MAG vs. NG commentary
Sep 28, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAG is a StrongBuy and NG is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2024
Stock price -- (MAG: $12.17 vs. NG: $3.97)
Brand notoriety: MAG and NG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MAG: 118% vs. NG: 87%
Market capitalization -- MAG: $1.12B vs. NG: $1B
MAG [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.12B. NG’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $977.73M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MAG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MAG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MAG and NG are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MAG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MAG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MAG is a better buy in the short-term than NG.

Price Growth

MAG (@Precious Metals) experienced а -10.45% price change this week, while NG (@Precious Metals) price change was -7.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8976.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

MAG is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2024.

NG is expected to report earnings on Oct 02, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.37% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAG($1.12B) has a higher market cap than NG($1B). MAG YTD gains are higher at: 16.907 vs. NG (6.150). MAG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -13.89M vs. NG (-33.7M). NG has more cash in the bank: 126M vs. MAG (68.7M). MAG has less debt than NG: MAG (154K) vs NG (138M). MAG (0) and NG (0) have equivalent revenues.
MAGNGMAG / NG
Capitalization1.12B1B112%
EBITDA-13.89M-33.7M41%
Gain YTD16.9076.150275%
P/E Ratio22.98N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash68.7M126M55%
Total Debt154K138M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MAG vs NG: Fundamental Ratings
MAG
NG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2117
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
80100
SMR RATING
1..100
67100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4637
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
88100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MAG's Valuation (94) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as NG (95). This means that MAG’s stock grew similarly to NG’s over the last 12 months.

MAG's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as NG (100). This means that MAG’s stock grew similarly to NG’s over the last 12 months.

MAG's SMR Rating (67) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NG (100). This means that MAG’s stock grew somewhat faster than NG’s over the last 12 months.

NG's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as MAG (46). This means that NG’s stock grew similarly to MAG’s over the last 12 months.

MAG's P/E Growth Rating (88) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as NG (100). This means that MAG’s stock grew similarly to NG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MAGNG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 2 months ago
0%
Bearish Trend about 2 months ago
0%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
NG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME23.14-0.28
-1.20%
GameStop Corp
TSLA210.60-3.51
-1.64%
Tesla
SPY552.08-11.60
-2.06%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL222.77-6.23
-2.72%
Apple
BTC.X57431.023000-1681.457000
-2.84%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency

MAG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAG has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAG jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAG
1D Price
Change %
MAG100%
-6.67%
PAAS - MAG
85%
Closely correlated
-5.24%
SAND - MAG
80%
Closely correlated
-4.27%
AEM - MAG
79%
Closely correlated
-3.02%
HL - MAG
79%
Closely correlated
-9.11%
AG - MAG
78%
Closely correlated
-5.55%
More

NG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NG has been loosely correlated with MAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NG jumps, then MAG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NG
1D Price
Change %
NG100%
-6.59%
MAG - NG
63%
Loosely correlated
-6.67%
SAND - NG
63%
Loosely correlated
-4.27%
HL - NG
62%
Loosely correlated
-9.11%
AEM - NG
61%
Loosely correlated
-3.02%
KGC - NG
59%
Loosely correlated
-4.87%
More