Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MADCX vs RNWBX
MADCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts MADCX vs RNWBX
BlackRock Emerging Mkts Instl
Price$32.24
Change+$2.90 (+9.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.05B
American Funds New World R2
Price$94.05
Change+$2.72 (+2.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
MADCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MADCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MADCX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. MADCX (2.05B). MADCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: MADCX (3.94) vs RNWBX (0.45). MADCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: MADCX (36 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than MADCX (1.02). MADCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 141.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MADCX: RNWBX (250) vs MADCX (2000000). MADCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 44.04 vs. RNWBX (26.27). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 7.03 vs. MADCX (2.90).
| MADCX | RNWBX | MADCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.66 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.66 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.511 | 5.996 | 159% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 250 | 800,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.05B | 75.5B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.94 | 0.45 | 875% |
| Returns for 1 year | 44.04 | 26.27 | 168% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.88 | 38.81 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.90 | 7.03 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 164.86 | 114.19 | 144% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement