MACQF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 12 closing price
Capitalization
4.31M
NWCBF
Price
$0.07
Change
+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Updated
Aug 18 closing price
Capitalization
128.71M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MACQF vs NWCBF

Header iconMACQF vs NWCBF Comparison
Open Charts MACQF vs NWCBFBanner chart's image
Themac Resources Group
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$15K
Capitalization4.31M
NEW WORLD COBALT
Price$0.07
Change+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Volume$75K
Capitalization128.71M
MACQF vs NWCBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MACQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NWCBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MACQF vs. NWCBF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MACQF is a Hold and NWCBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (MACQF: $0.05 vs. NWCBF: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: MACQF and NWCBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MACQF: 38% vs. NWCBF: 57%
Market capitalization -- MACQF: $4.31M vs. NWCBF: $128.71M
MACQF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $4.31M. NWCBF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $128.71M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MACQF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNWCBF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MACQF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NWCBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MACQF and NWCBF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MACQF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NWCBF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MACQF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • NWCBF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NWCBF is a better buy in the short-term than MACQF.

Price Growth

MACQF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NWCBF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NWCBF($129M) has a higher market cap than MACQF($4.31M). NWCBF YTD gains are higher at: 506.838 vs. MACQF (68.350). MACQF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.48M vs. NWCBF (-3.64M).
MACQFNWCBFMACQF / NWCBF
Capitalization4.31M129M3%
EBITDA-1.48M-3.64M41%
Gain YTD68.350506.83813%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash149KN/A-
Total Debt189MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MACQF: Fundamental Ratings
MACQF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
97
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MACQFNWCBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
27%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
29%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MACQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NWCBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA350.8412.31
+3.64%
Tesla
GME22.610.24
+1.07%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X111167.620000942.921900
+0.86%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
AAPL239.69-0.09
-0.04%
Apple
SPY647.24-1.88
-0.29%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF

MACQF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MACQF and JZRIF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MACQF and JZRIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MACQF
1D Price
Change %
MACQF100%
N/A
JZRIF - MACQF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MQMIF - MACQF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NWCBF - MACQF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ABRMF - MACQF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MIDLF - MACQF
24%
Poorly correlated
+13.33%
More

NWCBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NWCBF has been loosely correlated with HANCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NWCBF jumps, then HANCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NWCBF
1D Price
Change %
NWCBF100%
N/A
HANCF - NWCBF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PGXPF - NWCBF
29%
Poorly correlated
-6.78%
MACQF - NWCBF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JNDAF - NWCBF
20%
Poorly correlated
+13.18%
MALRY - NWCBF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
More