Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MACHX vs RLBAX
MACHX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts MACHX vs RLBAX
MoA Balanced Fund
Price$23.19
Change+$0.04 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets213.21M
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.62
Change+$0.04 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.37B
MACHX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MACHX vs. RLBAX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MACHX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 265B vs. MACHX (213M). MACHX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: MACHX (1.95) vs RLBAX (1.10). MACHX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: MACHX (41 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than MACHX (0.56). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. MACHX (36.98). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MACHX: RLBAX (250) vs MACHX (1000). MACHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.61 vs. RLBAX (7.84). RLBAX (37.69) and MACHX (36.60) have equivalent 5 years return.
| MACHX | RLBAX | MACHX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.31 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.31 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.899 | 13.947 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 213M | 265B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.95 | 1.10 | 177% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.61 | 7.84 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.46 | 47.39 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.60 | 37.69 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.56 | 67.66 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement