MAAS
Price
$3.51
Change
-$0.51 (-12.69%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
2.28B
TRIN
Price
$14.97
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
672.87M
16 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MAAS vs TRIN

Header iconMAAS vs TRIN Comparison
Open Charts MAAS vs TRINBanner chart's image
Maase
Price$3.51
Change-$0.51 (-12.69%)
Volume$56.66K
Capitalization2.28B
Trinity Capital
Price$14.97
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$532.69K
Capitalization672.87M
MAAS vs TRIN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MAAS vs. TRIN commentary
Jul 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAAS is a Hold and TRIN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 21, 2025
Stock price -- (MAAS: $3.51 vs. TRIN: $14.97)
Brand notoriety: MAAS and TRIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MAAS: 45% vs. TRIN: 70%
Market capitalization -- MAAS: $2.28B vs. TRIN: $672.87M
MAAS [@Investment Managers] is valued at $2.28B. TRIN’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $672.87M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MAAS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTRIN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MAAS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TRIN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TRIN is a better buy in the long-term than MAAS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MAAS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRIN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MAAS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TRIN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TRIN is a better buy in the short-term than MAAS.

Price Growth

MAAS (@Investment Managers) experienced а -16.43% price change this week, while TRIN (@Investment Managers) price change was +3.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +3.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.42%.

Reported Earning Dates

TRIN is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+3.67% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAAS($2.28B) has a higher market cap than TRIN($673M). MAAS YTD gains are higher at: 947.761 vs. TRIN (10.841).
MAASTRINMAAS / TRIN
Capitalization2.28B673M339%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD947.76110.8418,742%
P/E RatioN/A7.67-
RevenueN/A125M-
Total CashN/A707K-
Total DebtN/A640M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MAAS: Fundamental Ratings
MAAS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MAASTRIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ABINX20.240.01
+0.05%
American Century Balanced I
USISX18.37-0.01
-0.05%
Victory Income Stock
ACUSX13.18-0.01
-0.08%
Advisors Capital Total Return – Equity
STSVX19.24-0.04
-0.21%
BNY Mellon Sm Cp Val I
LGRCX23.40-0.06
-0.26%
Loomis Sayles Growth C

MAAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MAAS and OCCIN have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAAS and OCCIN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAAS
1D Price
Change %
MAAS100%
-12.69%
OCCIN - MAAS
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DHIL - MAAS
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.47%
TRIN - MAAS
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JHG - MAAS
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.26%
IVZ - MAAS
20%
Poorly correlated
+15.28%
More

TRIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRIN has been closely correlated with PNNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TRIN jumps, then PNNT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRIN
1D Price
Change %
TRIN100%
N/A
PNNT - TRIN
70%
Closely correlated
-0.41%
MAIN - TRIN
70%
Closely correlated
-0.65%
FSK - TRIN
69%
Closely correlated
-0.49%
PFLT - TRIN
69%
Closely correlated
-0.09%
TSLX - TRIN
68%
Closely correlated
-1.20%
More