MA
Price
$567.82
Change
-$0.10 (-0.02%)
Updated
Oct 15, 11:16 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
513.41B
14 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
OMF
Price
$55.87
Change
+$0.05 (+0.09%)
Updated
Oct 15, 11:16 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.64B
15 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MA vs OMF

Header iconMA vs OMF Comparison
Open Charts MA vs OMFBanner chart's image
Mastercard
Price$567.82
Change-$0.10 (-0.02%)
Volume$440
Capitalization513.41B
OneMain Holdings
Price$55.87
Change+$0.05 (+0.09%)
Volume$1.08K
Capitalization6.64B
MA vs OMF Comparison Chart in %
MA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MA vs. OMF commentary
Oct 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MA is a Hold and OMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 16, 2025
Stock price -- (MA: $567.92 vs. OMF: $55.82)
Brand notoriety: MA: Notable vs. OMF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MA: 102% vs. OMF: 127%
Market capitalization -- MA: $513.41B vs. OMF: $6.64B
MA [@Savings Banks] is valued at $513.41B. OMF’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $6.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $676.19B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $21.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOMF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • OMF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, OMF is a better buy in the long-term than MA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OMF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • OMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MA is a better buy in the short-term than OMF.

Price Growth

MA (@Savings Banks) experienced а -1.93% price change this week, while OMF (@Savings Banks) price change was +1.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -1.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +44.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

MA is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

OMF is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-1.10% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MA($513B) has a higher market cap than OMF($6.64B). MA has higher P/E ratio than OMF: MA (38.30) vs OMF (10.06). OMF YTD gains are higher at: 13.484 vs. MA (8.472). MA has less debt than OMF: MA (19B) vs OMF (22.1B). MA has higher revenues than OMF: MA (30.2B) vs OMF (4.76B).
MAOMFMA / OMF
Capitalization513B6.64B7,732%
EBITDA18.2BN/A-
Gain YTD8.47213.48463%
P/E Ratio38.3010.06381%
Revenue30.2B4.76B634%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt19B22.1B86%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MA vs OMF: Fundamental Ratings
MA
OMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1254
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1925
SMR RATING
1..100
118
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5456
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4843
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OMF's Valuation (15) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for MA (100). This means that OMF’s stock grew significantly faster than MA’s over the last 12 months.

MA's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as OMF (25). This means that MA’s stock grew similarly to OMF’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's SMR Rating (8) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as MA (11). This means that OMF’s stock grew similarly to MA’s over the last 12 months.

MA's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as OMF (56). This means that MA’s stock grew similarly to OMF’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as MA (48). This means that OMF’s stock grew similarly to MA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MAOMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GANX2.040.14
+7.37%
Gain Therapeutics
OFG43.381.18
+2.80%
OFG Bancorp
DDS621.3010.05
+1.64%
Dillards
VPG33.170.42
+1.28%
Vishay Precision Group
OXLCO23.38-0.06
-0.26%
Oxford Lane Capital Corp

MA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MA has been closely correlated with AXP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MA jumps, then AXP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MA
1D Price
Change %
MA100%
+1.55%
AXP - MA
67%
Closely correlated
+3.01%
OMF - MA
58%
Loosely correlated
+4.81%
COF - MA
58%
Loosely correlated
+3.17%
OBDC - MA
56%
Loosely correlated
+2.96%
PYPL - MA
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.42%
More

OMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OMF has been closely correlated with AXP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OMF jumps, then AXP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMF
1D Price
Change %
OMF100%
+4.81%
AXP - OMF
83%
Closely correlated
+3.01%
COF - OMF
82%
Closely correlated
+3.17%
SYF - OMF
82%
Closely correlated
+3.85%
ENVA - OMF
81%
Closely correlated
+4.24%
ALLY - OMF
79%
Closely correlated
+5.47%
More