M
Price
$18.00
Change
+$0.92 (+5.39%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
4.83B
46 days until earnings call
MAKSF
Price
$4.51
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
9.6B
Interact to see
Advertisement

M vs MAKSF

Header iconM vs MAKSF Comparison
Open Charts M vs MAKSFBanner chart's image
Macy's
Price$18.00
Change+$0.92 (+5.39%)
Volume$13.71M
Capitalization4.83B
Marks & Spencer Group
Price$4.51
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$405
Capitalization9.6B
M vs MAKSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAKSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
M vs. MAKSF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is M is a Buy and MAKSF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (M: $18.00 vs. MAKSF: $4.51)
Brand notoriety: M: Notable vs. MAKSF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Department Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: M: 144% vs. MAKSF: 12%
Market capitalization -- M: $4.83B vs. MAKSF: $9.6B
M [@Department Stores] is valued at $4.83B. MAKSF’s [@Department Stores] market capitalization is $9.6B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Department Stores] industry ranges from $12.34T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Department Stores] industry is $5.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

M’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMAKSF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • M’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MAKSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAKSF is a better buy in the long-term than M.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

M’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAKSF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • M’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MAKSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MAKSF is a better buy in the short-term than M.

Price Growth

M (@Department Stores) experienced а +2.56% price change this week, while MAKSF (@Department Stores) price change was +1.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Department Stores industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

M is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Department Stores (+0.01% weekly)

A department store sells a wide variety of consumer goods under different “departments,” including (but not necessarily limited to) apparel, household appliances, home furnishings, personal care products, cosmetics, consumer electronics. During healthy macroeconomic conditions, consumers typically won’t shy away from big-ticket purchases; but during a downturn, consumer spending might get limited to the most necessary/daily essentials. Several department stores purchase items on bulk from manufacturers for resale to consumers at a profit. Some of the largest department stores companies in the U.S. include Kohl’s Corporation, Macy’s Inc., and Ollie’s Bargain Outlet Holdings Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAKSF($9.6B) has a higher market cap than M($4.83B). MAKSF has higher P/E ratio than M: MAKSF (23.95) vs M (10.23). M YTD gains are higher at: 10.629 vs. MAKSF (-2.370). MAKSF has less debt than M: MAKSF (2.94B) vs M (5.66B).
MMAKSFM / MAKSF
Capitalization4.83B9.6B50%
EBITDAN/A1.49B-
Gain YTD10.629-2.370-448%
P/E Ratio10.2323.9543%
RevenueN/A13.8B-
Total CashN/A1.15B-
Total Debt5.66B2.94B192%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
M vs MAKSF: Fundamental Ratings
M
MAKSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8950
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6436
SMR RATING
1..100
6192
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3859
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9618
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

M's Valuation (23) in the Department Stores industry is in the same range as MAKSF (32) in the null industry. This means that M’s stock grew similarly to MAKSF’s over the last 12 months.

MAKSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as M (64) in the Department Stores industry. This means that MAKSF’s stock grew similarly to M’s over the last 12 months.

M's SMR Rating (61) in the Department Stores industry is in the same range as MAKSF (92) in the null industry. This means that M’s stock grew similarly to MAKSF’s over the last 12 months.

M's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Department Stores industry is in the same range as MAKSF (59) in the null industry. This means that M’s stock grew similarly to MAKSF’s over the last 12 months.

MAKSF's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for M (96) in the Department Stores industry. This means that MAKSF’s stock grew significantly faster than M’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MMAKSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
75%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAKSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FAOIX38.220.40
+1.06%
Fidelity Advisor Overseas I
CPECX21.950.17
+0.78%
Catalyst Dynamic Alpha C
BITSX30.330.19
+0.63%
iShares Total US Stock Market Idx Instl
FIFAX27.410.14
+0.51%
American Funds Income Fund of Amer F3
WBIRX31.32N/A
N/A
William Blair International Growth R6

M and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, M has been loosely correlated with DDS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if M jumps, then DDS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To M
1D Price
Change %
M100%
+5.39%
DDS - M
59%
Loosely correlated
+2.12%
KSS - M
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.12%
DDT - M
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
CBDBY - M
7%
Poorly correlated
+2.67%
AONNY - M
7%
Poorly correlated
+2.14%
More

MAKSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MAKSF and KSS have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAKSF and KSS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAKSF
1D Price
Change %
MAKSF100%
N/A
KSS - MAKSF
17%
Poorly correlated
+1.12%
M - MAKSF
3%
Poorly correlated
+5.39%
AONNY - MAKSF
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.14%
CBDBY - MAKSF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.67%
HDVTY - MAKSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More