Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LZSMX vs MIDCX
LZSMX vs MIDCX Comparison
Open Charts LZSMX vs MIDCX
Lazard Global Small Cap Eq Open
Price$10.25
Change-$0.28 (-2.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.4M
MFS International New Discovery C
Price$30.49
Change-$0.17 (-0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.53B
LZSMX vs MIDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZSMX vs. MIDCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZSMX is a Buy and MIDCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MIDCX has more cash in the bank: 7.53B vs. LZSMX (12.4M). LZSMX pays higher dividends than MIDCX: LZSMX (1.76) vs MIDCX (1.40). LZSMX was incepted earlier than MIDCX: LZSMX (29 years) vs MIDCX (25 years). LZSMX (2.50) is less costly to investors than MIDCX (2.06). LZSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. MIDCX (15.00). MIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZSMX: MIDCX (1000) vs LZSMX (2500). LZSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.87 vs. MIDCX (5.27). MIDCX (-7.32) and LZSMX (-7.53) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LZSMX | MIDCX | LZSMX / MIDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 2.05 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.50 | 2.06 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 32.883 | 15.177 | 217% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.4M | 7.53B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.76 | 1.40 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.87 | 5.27 | 586% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.35 | 14.31 | 296% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.53 | -7.32 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.40 | 20.56 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement