Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LZSMX vs MIDBX
LZSMX vs MIDBX Comparison
Open Charts LZSMX vs MIDBX
Lazard Global Small Cap Eq Open
Price$10.83
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.16M
MFS International New Discovery B
Price$31.42
Change+$0.02 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.57B
LZSMX vs MIDBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZSMX vs. MIDBX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZSMX is a Hold and MIDBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MIDBX has more cash in the bank: 7.57B vs. LZSMX (13.2M). LZSMX pays higher dividends than MIDBX: LZSMX (1.75) vs MIDBX (1.07). LZSMX was incepted earlier than MIDBX: LZSMX (29 years) vs MIDBX (25 years). LZSMX (2.50) is less costly to investors than MIDBX (2.06). LZSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. MIDBX (15.00). MIDBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZSMX: MIDBX (1000) vs LZSMX (2500). LZSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.50 vs. MIDBX (13.72). MIDBX return over 5 years is better than : -8.39 vs. LZSMX (-12.37).
| LZSMX | MIDBX | LZSMX / MIDBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 2.05 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.50 | 2.06 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 36.669 | 14.338 | 256% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.2M | 7.57B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.75 | 1.07 | 164% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.50 | 13.72 | 266% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.28 | 19.00 | 249% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.37 | -8.39 | 147% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.90 | 18.26 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers