Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LZSMX vs MIDBX
LZSMX vs MIDBX Comparison
Open Charts LZSMX vs MIDBX
Lazard Global Small Cap Eq Open
Price$11.69
Change+$1.12 (+10.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.27M
MFS International New Discovery B
Price$32.49
Change+$0.70 (+2.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.79B
LZSMX vs MIDBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZSMX vs. MIDBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZSMX is a Buy and MIDBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MIDBX has more cash in the bank: 7.8B vs. LZSMX (14.3M). LZSMX pays higher dividends than MIDBX: LZSMX (1.52) vs MIDBX (0.00). LZSMX was incepted earlier than MIDBX: LZSMX (29 years) vs MIDBX (25 years). LZSMX (2.50) is less costly to investors than MIDBX (2.06). LZSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. MIDBX (17.00). MIDBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZSMX: MIDBX (1000) vs LZSMX (2500). LZSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.90 vs. MIDBX (16.55). MIDBX return over 5 years is better than : -7.54 vs. LZSMX (-8.55).
| LZSMX | MIDBX | LZSMX / MIDBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 2.05 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.50 | 2.06 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.501 | 3.292 | 289% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.3M | 7.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.52 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 41.90 | 16.55 | 253% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.74 | 14.00 | 327% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.55 | -7.54 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.14 | 32.24 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement