LZRFY
Price
$7.53
Change
-$0.50 (-6.23%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
15.01B
MAMTF
Price
$13.98
Change
+$0.05 (+0.36%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
423.26M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LZRFY vs MAMTF

Header iconLZRFY vs MAMTF Comparison
Open Charts LZRFY vs MAMTFBanner chart's image
Localiza Rent A Car SA
Price$7.53
Change-$0.50 (-6.23%)
Volume$21.77K
Capitalization15.01B
Mcan Mortgage
Price$13.98
Change+$0.05 (+0.36%)
Volume$525
Capitalization423.26M
LZRFY vs MAMTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LZRFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAMTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LZRFY vs. MAMTF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZRFY is a Hold and MAMTF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (LZRFY: $7.53 vs. MAMTF: $13.98)
Brand notoriety: LZRFY and MAMTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LZRFY: 242% vs. MAMTF: 119%
Market capitalization -- LZRFY: $15.01B vs. MAMTF: $423.26M
LZRFY [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $15.01B. MAMTF’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $423.26M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LZRFY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMAMTF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • LZRFY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MAMTF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAMTF is a better buy in the long-term than LZRFY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LZRFY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAMTF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LZRFY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MAMTF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MAMTF is a better buy in the short-term than LZRFY.

Price Growth

LZRFY (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -3.34% price change this week, while MAMTF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +0.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +3.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+3.75% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LZRFY($15B) has a higher market cap than MAMTF($423M). LZRFY has higher P/E ratio than MAMTF: LZRFY (34.25) vs MAMTF (8.47). LZRFY YTD gains are higher at: 38.874 vs. MAMTF (3.479). LZRFY has higher revenues than MAMTF: LZRFY (21.9B) vs MAMTF (101M).
LZRFYMAMTFLZRFY / MAMTF
Capitalization15B423M3,546%
EBITDA8.92BN/A-
Gain YTD38.8743.4791,117%
P/E Ratio34.258.47404%
Revenue21.9B101M21,683%
Total CashN/A816M-
Total DebtN/A31.8M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LZRFY vs MAMTF: Fundamental Ratings
LZRFY
MAMTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8940
SMR RATING
1..100
7833
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4451
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6617
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MAMTF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as LZRFY (25). This means that MAMTF’s stock grew similarly to LZRFY’s over the last 12 months.

MAMTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LZRFY (89). This means that MAMTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LZRFY’s over the last 12 months.

MAMTF's SMR Rating (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LZRFY (78). This means that MAMTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LZRFY’s over the last 12 months.

LZRFY's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as MAMTF (51). This means that LZRFY’s stock grew similarly to MAMTF’s over the last 12 months.

MAMTF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LZRFY (66). This means that MAMTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LZRFY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LZRFYMAMTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
83%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
22%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LZRFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAMTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CGJIX70.120.43
+0.62%
Calvert US Large Cap Growth Rspnb Idx I
LADQX19.500.05
+0.26%
Lord Abbett Developing Growth R2
JVAYX38.600.10
+0.26%
JPMorgan Value Advantage R6
WBBIX10.220.02
+0.20%
TETON Westwood Balanced I
PMIRX10.830.01
+0.09%
Putnam Multi-Asset Income R

LZRFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LZRFY and AER have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LZRFY and AER's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LZRFY
1D Price
Change %
LZRFY100%
-6.23%
AER - LZRFY
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.30%
TBCRF - LZRFY
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.85%
AL - LZRFY
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
MAMTF - LZRFY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KGTHY - LZRFY
5%
Poorly correlated
-10.01%
More

MAMTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MAMTF and BRLGF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAMTF and BRLGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAMTF
1D Price
Change %
MAMTF100%
N/A
BRLGF - MAMTF
28%
Poorly correlated
-6.51%
ZIZTF - MAMTF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LZRFY - MAMTF
7%
Poorly correlated
-6.23%
KGTHY - MAMTF
1%
Poorly correlated
-10.01%
FCRM - MAMTF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More