It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LZM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LZM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
LZM (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -3.69% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +167.93%.
LZM is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2025.
The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
| LZM | PWER | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 10 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 87% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LZM has been loosely correlated with SGML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LZM jumps, then SGML could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that PWER and NPWR have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PWER and NPWR's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PWER | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PWER | 100% | +1.08% | ||
| NPWR - PWER | 18% Poorly correlated | -0.91% | ||
| AA - PWER | 15% Poorly correlated | +6.80% | ||
| EOG - PWER | 14% Poorly correlated | -0.55% | ||
| LZM - PWER | 13% Poorly correlated | -2.74% | ||
| DAR - PWER | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.67% | ||
More | ||||