LZM
Price
$4.67
Change
+$0.19 (+4.24%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
627.96M
73 days until earnings call
MUNMF
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
12.37M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LZM vs MUNMF

Header iconLZM vs MUNMF Comparison
Open Charts LZM vs MUNMFBanner chart's image
Lifezone Metals
Price$4.67
Change+$0.19 (+4.24%)
Volume$52.3K
Capitalization627.96M
Mundoro Capital
Price$0.17
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$38.15K
Capitalization12.37M
LZM vs MUNMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LZM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MUNMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LZM vs. MUNMF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZM is a Hold and MUNMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (LZM: $4.67 vs. MUNMF: $0.17)
Brand notoriety: LZM and MUNMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LZM: 41% vs. MUNMF: 88%
Market capitalization -- LZM: $627.96M vs. MUNMF: $12.37M
LZM [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $627.96M. MUNMF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $12.37M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LZM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMUNMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LZM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MUNMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MUNMF is a better buy in the long-term than LZM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LZM’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MUNMF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LZM’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MUNMF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LZM is a better buy in the short-term than MUNMF.

Price Growth

LZM (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +8.35% price change this week, while MUNMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +5.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

LZM is expected to report earnings on Sep 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LZM($628M) has a higher market cap than MUNMF($12.4M). MUNMF YTD gains are higher at: 46.643 vs. LZM (-32.806). MUNMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.82M vs. LZM (-32.95M). LZM has more cash in the bank: 44.4M vs. MUNMF (7.29M). LZM has higher revenues than MUNMF: LZM (2.32M) vs MUNMF (0).
LZMMUNMFLZM / MUNMF
Capitalization628M12.4M5,065%
EBITDA-32.95M-1.82M1,812%
Gain YTD-32.80646.643-70%
P/E Ratio1250.00N/A-
Revenue2.32M0-
Total Cash44.4M7.29M609%
Total Debt496KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MUNMF: Fundamental Ratings
MUNMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
51
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
71
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LZMMUNMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LZM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MUNMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ULTHF0.11N/A
+2.64%
United Lithium Corp.
BICEF63.00N/A
N/A
Bic Stec
EXSR105.00N/A
N/A
Exchange Bank (Santa Rosa, CA)
RBNK23.99N/A
N/A
RiverBank Holding Company
KNBWY14.07-0.07
-0.50%
Kirin Holdings Co., Ltd.

LZM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LZM has been loosely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LZM jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LZM
1D Price
Change %
LZM100%
+4.24%
FCX - LZM
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
TECK - LZM
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.13%
HBM - LZM
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.19%
SCCO - LZM
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.22%
ERO - LZM
36%
Loosely correlated
-2.81%
More

MUNMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MUNMF and THSGF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MUNMF and THSGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MUNMF
1D Price
Change %
MUNMF100%
-0.55%
THSGF - MUNMF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.84%
LZM - MUNMF
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.24%
GCCFF - MUNMF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
TMQ - MUNMF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PUTKY - MUNMF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.64%
More