Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LZFOX vs TEDSX
LZFOX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts LZFOX vs TEDSX
Lazard Equity Franchise Open Shares
Price$8.15
Change-$0.03 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.74M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$32.44
Change-$0.36 (-1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.43B
LZFOX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZFOX vs. TEDSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZFOX is a Buy and TEDSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.43B vs. LZFOX (42.7M). LZFOX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: LZFOX (2.02) vs TEDSX (0.75). LZFOX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: LZFOX (8 years) vs TEDSX (33 years). LZFOX (3.21) is less costly to investors than TEDSX (1.96). LZFOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. TEDSX (34.55). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZFOX: TEDSX (1000) vs LZFOX (2500). TEDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.08 vs. LZFOX (-16.10). TEDSX return over 5 years is better than : 27.14 vs. LZFOX (-9.52).
| LZFOX | TEDSX | LZFOX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.96 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.21 | 1.96 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.772 | 16.851 | -11% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7M | 9.43B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.02 | 0.75 | 267% |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.10 | 5.08 | -317% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.05 | 17.27 | -87% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.52 | 27.14 | -35% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 10.70 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement