Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LZFOX vs TEDSX
LZFOX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts LZFOX vs TEDSX
Lazard Equity Franchise Open Shares
Price$8.75
Change+$0.03 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.39M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$32.90
Change+$0.16 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.47B
LZFOX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZFOX vs. TEDSX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZFOX is a Hold and TEDSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.47B vs. LZFOX (46.4M). LZFOX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: LZFOX (1.95) vs TEDSX (0.85). LZFOX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: LZFOX (8 years) vs TEDSX (33 years). LZFOX (3.21) is less costly to investors than TEDSX (1.96). LZFOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. TEDSX (34.55). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZFOX: TEDSX (1000) vs LZFOX (2500). TEDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.30 vs. LZFOX (-14.87). TEDSX return over 5 years is better than : 37.83 vs. LZFOX (6.43).
| LZFOX | TEDSX | LZFOX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.96 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.21 | 1.96 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.072 | 17.207 | 29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46.4M | 9.47B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.95 | 0.85 | 229% |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.87 | 3.30 | -450% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.37 | 27.56 | -1% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.43 | 37.83 | 17% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 7.98 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement