Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LZFIX vs TEDSX
LZFIX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts LZFIX vs TEDSX
Lazard Equity Franchise Inst Shr
Price$8.74
Change+$0.08 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.26M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$32.74
Change+$0.18 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.42B
LZFIX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZFIX vs. TEDSX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZFIX is a Hold and TEDSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.42B vs. LZFIX (46.3M). LZFIX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: LZFIX (2.19) vs TEDSX (0.85). LZFIX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: LZFIX (8 years) vs TEDSX (33 years). TEDSX (1.96) is less costly to investors than LZFIX (0.94). LZFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. TEDSX (34.55). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZFIX: TEDSX (1000) vs LZFIX (10000). TEDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.93 vs. LZFIX (-14.82). TEDSX return over 5 years is better than : 36.44 vs. LZFIX (7.50).
| LZFIX | TEDSX | LZFIX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.96 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.96 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.952 | 16.637 | 30% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 1000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46.3M | 9.42B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.19 | 0.85 | 258% |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.82 | 2.93 | -506% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.14 | 28.46 | -0% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.50 | 36.44 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 9.22 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement