Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LZFIX vs TEDSX
LZFIX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts LZFIX vs TEDSX
Lazard Equity Franchise Inst Shr
Price$8.17
Change-$0.03 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.74M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$32.44
Change-$0.36 (-1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.43B
LZFIX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZFIX vs. TEDSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZFIX is a Buy and TEDSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.43B vs. LZFIX (42.7M). LZFIX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: LZFIX (2.27) vs TEDSX (0.75). LZFIX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: LZFIX (8 years) vs TEDSX (33 years). TEDSX (1.96) is less costly to investors than LZFIX (0.94). LZFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. TEDSX (34.55). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZFIX: TEDSX (1000) vs LZFIX (10000). TEDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.08 vs. LZFIX (-15.47). TEDSX return over 5 years is better than : 27.14 vs. LZFIX (-8.29).
| LZFIX | TEDSX | LZFIX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.96 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.96 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.893 | 16.851 | -11% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 1000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7M | 9.43B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.27 | 0.75 | 301% |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.47 | 5.08 | -304% |
| Returns for 3 years | -14.16 | 17.27 | -82% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.29 | 27.14 | -31% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 10.70 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement