Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LZFIX vs TEDRX
LZFIX vs TEDRX Comparison
Open Charts LZFIX vs TEDRX
Lazard Equity Franchise Inst Shr
Price$7.17
Change+$0.05 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.01M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery R
Price$30.87
Change-$0.04 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.61B
LZFIX vs TEDRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZFIX vs. TEDRX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZFIX is a Hold and TEDRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDRX has more cash in the bank: 9.61B vs. LZFIX (37M). LZFIX pays higher dividends than TEDRX: LZFIX (6.26) vs TEDRX (1.42). LZFIX was incepted earlier than TEDRX: LZFIX (8 years) vs TEDRX (24 years). TEDRX (1.46) is less costly to investors than LZFIX (0.94). LZFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. TEDRX (34.55). TEDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZFIX: TEDRX (1000) vs LZFIX (10000). TEDRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.67 vs. LZFIX (-5.79). TEDRX return over 5 years is better than : 14.49 vs. LZFIX (-21.11).
| LZFIX | TEDRX | LZFIX / TEDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.46 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.46 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.417 | 2.216 | -19% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 1000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37M | 9.61B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.26 | 1.42 | 440% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.79 | 14.67 | -39% |
| Returns for 3 years | -17.08 | 17.26 | -99% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.11 | 14.49 | -146% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 27.27 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement