Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LZFIX vs PRIKX
LZFIX vs PRIKX Comparison
Open Charts LZFIX vs PRIKX
Lazard Equity Franchise Inst Shr
Price$9.01
Change+$0.09 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.61M
T. Rowe Price Real Assets I
Price$16.14
Change+$0.03 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.42B
LZFIX vs PRIKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZFIX vs. PRIKX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZFIX is a StrongBuy and PRIKX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRIKX has more cash in the bank: 11.4B vs. LZFIX (47.6M). LZFIX pays higher dividends than PRIKX: LZFIX (2.15) vs PRIKX (1.66). LZFIX was incepted earlier than PRIKX: LZFIX (8 years) vs PRIKX (10 years). LZFIX (0.94) is less costly to investors than PRIKX (0.67). LZFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. PRIKX (41.30). LZFIX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRIKX: LZFIX (10000) vs PRIKX (500000). PRIKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.52 vs. LZFIX (-12.27). PRIKX return over 5 years is better than : 58.06 vs. LZFIX (13.93).
| LZFIX | PRIKX | LZFIX / PRIKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.67 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.67 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.194 | 17.532 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 500000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47.6M | 11.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.15 | 1.66 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.27 | 12.52 | -98% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.42 | 30.85 | -5% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.93 | 58.06 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 106.42 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement