Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LZFIX vs PRIKX
LZFIX vs PRIKX Comparison
Open Charts LZFIX vs PRIKX
Lazard Equity Franchise Inst Shr
Price$9.85
Change+$0.02 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.71M
T. Rowe Price Real Assets I
Price$15.41
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.87B
LZFIX vs PRIKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZFIX vs. PRIKX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZFIX is a Buy and PRIKX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRIKX has more cash in the bank: 10.9B vs. LZFIX (48.7M). LZFIX pays higher dividends than PRIKX: LZFIX (2.09) vs PRIKX (1.77). LZFIX was incepted earlier than PRIKX: LZFIX (8 years) vs PRIKX (10 years). LZFIX (0.94) is less costly to investors than PRIKX (0.67). LZFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. PRIKX (41.30). LZFIX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRIKX: LZFIX (10000) vs PRIKX (500000). PRIKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.73 vs. LZFIX (5.95). PRIKX return over 5 years is better than : 59.90 vs. LZFIX (30.96).
| LZFIX | PRIKX | LZFIX / PRIKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.67 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.67 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.247 | 11.183 | 163% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 500000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.7M | 10.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.09 | 1.77 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.95 | 8.73 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.96 | 26.07 | 11% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.96 | 59.90 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement