Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LZFIX vs PRIKX
LZFIX vs PRIKX Comparison
Open Charts LZFIX vs PRIKX
Lazard Equity Franchise Inst Shr
Price$9.36
Change-$0.22 (-2.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.31M
T. Rowe Price Real Assets I
Price$15.24
Change-$0.02 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.83B
LZFIX vs PRIKX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZFIX vs. PRIKX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZFIX is a Buy and PRIKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRIKX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. LZFIX (47.3M). LZFIX pays higher dividends than PRIKX: LZFIX (2.13) vs PRIKX (1.82). LZFIX was incepted earlier than PRIKX: LZFIX (8 years) vs PRIKX (10 years). LZFIX (0.94) is less costly to investors than PRIKX (0.67). LZFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. PRIKX (41.30). LZFIX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRIKX: LZFIX (10000) vs PRIKX (500000). PRIKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.73 vs. LZFIX (-0.36). PRIKX return over 5 years is better than : 59.96 vs. LZFIX (22.78).
| LZFIX | PRIKX | LZFIX / PRIKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.67 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.67 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.365 | 9.957 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 500000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47.3M | 10.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.13 | 1.82 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.36 | 9.73 | -4% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.38 | 20.33 | -7% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.78 | 59.96 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers